I realize that, when reading the views of someone I disagree with, I tend to require stiffer support for their arguments than I would for someone I agree with.
So I wonder if that is happening to me here, or if in fact my intial reaction is right - that the Honorable Judge Wilson is completely off his nut, having shirked his duty to the law to produce the opinion that he wants?
Also, does the fact that this is being played "by the book", without regard to the fact that Congress has reached beyond its competence, make new difficulties in the future seperation of powers?
March 23, 2005 8:18 AM
| TrackBack