The Reliability of RIAA Subpoenas
September 24, 2003 Music
The Register, the fun British tech news and curmudgeon site, has written about a quietly dropped RIAA lawsuit against a user accused of sharing 2000 songs.
The RIAA said Sarah Ward was sharing 2,000 songs through the KaZaA P2P network exposing her, at $150,000 per offense, to $300,000,000 in penalties. But not only had she never downloaded a song, but as a Macintosh user, she couldn't even run the KaZaA software, which only runs on Windows.
While there are peer-to-peer options for Mac users, this certainly lowers the credibility of the entire RIAA approach. I'm imagining a lawyer whose case goes like this. "So, my client was selected by the same team of elite information gatherers who decided that a 66 year old woman was sharing 2000 songs via a Macintosh, which could not possibly have run the software you accused her of running. What makes you think you got this one right?"
.:Posted by Michael on September 24, 2003 10:44 AM:.
Mor(e)on RIAA Due Process violations
Blogcritic ringleader Eric Olsen adds further details to my comments on the RIAA process, noting that Senator Sam Brownback (R.-Kan.)......
.:Posted to Ones and Zeros on Sep 25, 2003 4:16 PM:.

Guessing she doesn't have a copy of Virtual PC installed?

.:Posted by ChuckEye ( total) on September 29, 2003 2:16 AM:.
Archives
Archives
Category Archives
Recent Entries
Comment Leaders
Links


Blogcritics: news and reviews
 
Syndicate this site (XML)
Powered by

powered by Movable Type
Movable Type 3.33
Apple Computer