Category : Politics (68)
October 05, 2006
Credit Where Credit is DuePolitics
Normally nasty right-wing partisan Michelle Malkin is at least willing to tell her fellow travelers when they're over the line:
Also lost in the feeding frenzy is the plain, indelible fact that Foley initiated his sexually explicit contacts with the exposed young man when he was a minor.
...
The fact that Foley continued his contact with the exposed young man after he turned 18 does not mitigate his original predatory behavior before.--Michelle Malkin
What Foley did was wrong, and no matter what dark thoughts you have about how it got out or who should've done something about it, shifting the blame from Foley to the minors is not OK. I'm not counting on great things from Malkin in the future, but at least she's not trying to blame the Democrats for Foley's predation. Or the victims.
.:Posted by Michael at 03:00 PM | :.

October 04, 2006
One Toke Over The Line, Sweet Jesus...Politics
Apparently they corrected their "little error" in later rebroadcasts of O'Reilly, but it certainly would be the answer to their dilemma, if it had been the case... (via)
.:Posted by Michael at 07:14 AM | :.

May 23, 2006
Conservatives unhappy that Bush is a tool of business...Politics
Well, it's pretty much "Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me 65 months in a row, and perhaps the common thread in the problem is me." The Wapo reports that Sixty-five months into Bush's presidency, conservatives feel betrayed. Me, I'm just unhappy that Bush is a tool. And I knew that more than 65 months ago, guys. You could've asked...
.:Posted by Michael at 11:59 PM | :.

September 28, 2005
The President's Options on Tom DeLayPolitics
So, the big question now is "will the President appoint Tom DeLay to investigate himself, or will he just go ahead and award him the Medal Of Freedom?"
.:Posted by Michael at 04:54 PM :.

June 03, 2005
When Republicans Attack...Other Republicans...Politics
The Republican Gubernatorial Primary in New Jersey is nasty, and former Jersey City Mayor Bret Schundler is starting to run like a candidate who's running behind. It's nice to see him jump the frontrunner at a Memorial Day parade. It smacks of desperation. Forrester has turned to going after Corzine, but Bret is still scrapping. Democracy in action. The Corzine people sent me a link to a politicsnj.com article: Separated at Birth: Bret Schundler and Howard Dean It's a Schundler web-ad that was photoshopped over a Howard Dean photo. It's unclear where it came from, but it's funny if the Schundler-ites had to take a Dean crowd shot and manipulate it to sell their bumper-stickers and it's also funny if the Forrester people made it up to smack Schundler. Don't know how long it'll be there, but it's hi-larious. Oh yeah. "Boo! Howard Dean! Scary!"
.:Posted by Michael at 01:47 PM :.

January 07, 2005
If I can, I will...Politics
KF100_lg1.jpg
Kinky Friedman for Governor
Kinky Friedman, singer, writer, gadfly, and Texan is running for governor. If we're there in 2006, he's very likely to get my vote.
KF033_lg.jpg
Given that I'm at least 80% in agreement with his positions on the issues, which is generally 80% more than I have been with the two men I'm hoping will be known as "his predecessors in office", I don't see a downside. Run, Kinky, Run...

For reference, here are a few of his slogans
  • "Kinky for Governor, How hard could it be?"
  • "My Governor is a Jewish Cowboy"
  • "He Ain't Kinky, He's my Governor"
  • "Kinky for Governor. Why the Hell Not?"--my personal fave
.:Posted by Michael at 09:19 AM | :.

January 06, 2005
Office of Traffic Safety and VoyeurismPolitics
The Register reports on CCTV Peeping Toms. The three traffic safety snoops apparently decided to train their cameras inside some woman's flat. The next time someone tells you that traffic surveillance cameras would never be used for the wrong purposes, it's worth noting that they already have been.
.:Posted by Michael at 11:45 PM :.

October 05, 2004
On Global TestsPolitics
...[T]o place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take.
--Thomas Jefferson, 1825
Mr. Jefferson explains why it was necessary to write a document explaining to the world why starting a war was the last resort of the American people.
you've got to do in a way that passes the test—that passes the global test—where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing, and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons.
--John F. Kerry, 2004
Mr. Kerry is firmly in line with Thomas Jefferson.
I have a different view.
--George W. Bush, 2004
Mr. Bush's view is not. I agree with Misters Jefferson and Kerry.
.:Posted by Michael at 09:30 PM | :.

October 01, 2004
Houston Chief of Police favors halting executions.Politics
Ellis asks for halt to executions from county, Chief of HPD agrees as both cite concerns over crime lab. This is big news from Harris County. I hope they follow through. Convictions that are not clean tarnish the entire system.
"I think it would be very prudent for us as a system, a criminal justice system, to delay further executions until we've had an opportunity to re-examine evidence that played a particular role in the conviction of an individual that was sentenced to death," [Houston Police Chief Harold] Hurtt said.
Left or right, pro- or anti-death penalty, you can't allow executions based on faulty evidence. via Avedon
.:Posted by Michael at 09:58 PM :.

June 22, 2004
...Put Food on Your FamilyPolitics
The George W. Bush Singers are a lot of fun if you think the president is a funny man. And one of the GWBSingers is Guy Forsyth Very cool, via The Sideshow
.:Posted by Michael at 04:25 PM :.

June 08, 2004
A government of laws, not menPolitics
"That an elected official may willfully violate a law any time he or she believes it is unconstitutional has profound and unsettling implications," Justice Kavanagh wrote. "This view, if accepted, would mean that the [public official] is a law unto himself." Pop Quiz: Gay Marriage Mayor or Torture Approving President? It's fascinating how breaking the law in the name of doing right is justifiable when it's your side doing it. "A rebellion is always legal in the first person, such as 'our rebellion.' Is it only in the third person--'their rebellion'--that it becomes illegal." --Ben Franklin, 1776
.:Posted by Michael at 07:17 PM :.

March 03, 2004
Things that make you go "Snerk!"Politics
Digby says...
As all 6 of my readers know, I have not only written against gay marriage, but have also been a proponent of changing marriage back to its traditional meaning --- abduction of a woman and seizure of her family's property.
via The Sideshow
.:Posted by Michael at 09:05 PM :.

February 24, 2004
Rod Paige and the Terrorist OrganizationPolitics
Yesterday I was sorta down on Rod Paige, the last cabinet member in line for the presidency in the event of a crisis, as I mentioned in response to Kuff's Defining Terrorist Down post. I've been thinking about school and when Rod Paige defined the NEA as a "terrorist organization", I may know what he was thinking about.
When we grew up and went to school there were certain teachers who would hurt the children any way they could by pouring their derision upon anything we did and exposing every weakness however carefully hidden by the kids, but in the town it was well known when they got home at night, their fat and psychopathic wives would thrash them within inches of their lives.
If I close my eyes, I can hear the voices of every repressed child singing a song of alienation and freedom. If this administration is not to be perceived as "soft of terrorism". then they must act unilaterally and immediately to stamp out this scourge. It's a good thing Secretary of Education Rod Paige is there to tell us about these threats. I think many of us must have suppressed these memories of The Happiest Days of Our Lives.
.:Posted by Michael at 10:41 PM | :.

I AM One of the American People!Politics
Their actions have created confusion on an issue that requires clarity. On a matter of such importance, the voice of the people must be heard. Activist courts have left the people with one recourse.

George W. Bush, being a sanctimonious prig on gay marriage.

Then let my voice by clearly heard: this member of the American people supports the right of gay Americans to legally marry. This member of the American people does not support fiddling with the Constitution to enshrine anti-gay bigotry in it. This member of the American people wishes the President would shut up about what he thinks we want—because in many cases, he’s flat-out wrong.

via Perverse Access Memory Couldn't have said it better. I do wish to add that it's sad for poor Dubya that it's not really 'Activist Judges' but 'the people' who are speaking on this.
.:Posted by Michael at 07:46 PM | :.

February 09, 2004
Like Kindergarten, but without the adult supervision...Politics
Somewhat belatedly, I figured out what my reaction to Josh Marshall's concern about the scope of Bush's intelligence investigation was.

Josh thinks, and I concur, that the mission of this group is too limited and that it's subject to too much political CYA by the very agencies it's supposed to be investigating.

It was when I read this:
Anything the White House did with those CIA analyses, any fisticuffs between the Veep's office and the CIA, anything stovepiped through Doug Feith's operation at the Pentagon, anything that made its way from Chalabi's mumbo-jumbocrats to the the president's speechwriters -- that's all beyond their brief.
that I reacted. "Of course Bush doesn't need to investigate that. 'Questions I know the answers to I don't need to ask, right?'" I am a child of the 1980's, remembering 20 year old Calvin and Hobbes lines just happens naturally for me. Someday I'll wish those brain cells were devoted to something else. But it would probably be Cyndi Lauper lyrics, so I guess it's a wash. I've come to the conclusion that we got what we asked for: an administration being run by Calvin. It all fits: the grades, the ADD symptoms, the adventures of Spaceman Spiff on the desert-planet Iraq II, his imaginary friends in their undisclosed locations, his uncanny ability to rationalize how doing what he wants will really be good for everyone and, of course, the quote in the image. If you do the job badly enough, sometimes you don't get asked to do it again.--Calvin, on shoveling snow.
.:Posted by Michael at 11:38 PM :.

January 28, 2004
"Looking Mighty Fine in them Jeans, Boy."Politics
The Globe and Mail reports on our only President, the man who brought dignity back to the White House, and his taste in executive aides. Apparently he's got an eye for the young, fit, Liberal aides. Like Scott Reid. Oh, and Momma Strayhorn-Keeton-Rhylander may not have raised no dumb boys, but the President of the United States of America is telling foreign politicians that her favorite son is ugly. The money quote? "When a Texas Republican says you've got a pretty face, then I guess there is just no way around it." - Scott Reid, the senior strategist to Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. One wonders if Reid has seen Deliverance. Perhaps he should turn down any invitations to Crawford. via Nuadha
.:Posted by Michael at 06:17 PM | :.

December 07, 2003
It's a Sanchez Landslide!Politics

I didn't doctor this screenshot. This is exactly what showed up in my browser window when I went back to check the election results a few minutes ago. I knew it didn't make sense, but just the fact that it was there gave me that "Dewey Defeats Truman" feeling.

While a transitory mistake on the web is hardly unheard of, it's nice to see that over 80% of the voters were in Sanchez's camp. Oh. Wait. Congratulations to Mayor White. Now fix my sidewalk.
.:Posted by Michael at 12:00 AM | :.

September 14, 2003
52 Pick Up for Dean...Politics

Howard Dean Solitaire by Freeverse Software is a demo project advertising their "corporate premium" version of Burning Monkey Solitaire. It's basically a skinned solitaire game with Dean images. They'll skin whatever you want and give you 100-10000 copies for you to give away at your corporate barbeque or trade show

I don't know if it's more amusing to me that there's a Dean solitaire game or that the software company is using Dean to promote their corporate premium.


.:Posted by Michael at 03:48 PM :.

September 02, 2003
Is Al Gore behind this?Politics
Switch to Dean mimics the Apple Switch campaign, with stories from three former Kerry supporters, two Greens, and two independents. It's not an official Dean Campaign site. It's pretty clear who the audience is. This bit is from Michael, who has always voted Green:
I mean, the main other reason, though, is I kind of felt let down by the outcome of the 2000 election.  I very much felt that Nader, at the end of that, should have told the Green Party members to vote for Gore and thrown his support behind Gore. Even though I didn’t really like Gore, I guess I didn’t know how terrible Bush would have been and I’m willing to compromise a little more this time and, you know, I recognize that getting somebody other than Bush elected is key and Dean can win.  That’s why I support Dean.
As an Apple user, I think it's interesting, especially since Al Gore is on Apple's board. I hope that Dean can get better marketshare.
.:Posted by Michael at 12:44 AM :.

August 15, 2003
Fairness And Balance in OutsourcingPolitics
Republicans to raise funds via Noida, Gurgaon. With all the talk of outsourcing technical positions to India and the loss of high-paying technical jobs at places like ADP and BMC, it should not be forgotten that lousy, creepy jobs are also going offshore.
Hello, I'm calling for the Republican Party, do you have any money to spend to help make America a better place for her corporate overlords?

Love to help the cause, buddy, but I just lost my job when they opened that new overseas call center.
-via The Fair and Balanced Daily Kos
.:Posted by Michael at 01:49 PM | :.

August 04, 2003
Bullies never changePolitics
Statesman | GOP to Senate Democrats: Pay up (link via Political State Report: Texas) When I was in 7th grade, there were two bullies in my English class. Both of them were big, as I was, and they didn't like it that the teacher and I talked SF and I did well. One day it came down to a shoving match outside the classroom. And by shoving I mean "throwing each other into the wall of lockers." I think they'd dumped my books or something and I'd called them something insulting in return. I don't really recall. None of us were really coordinated or tough enough to actually throw a punch. The fight didn't last long, because the teacher came out and broke it up, or would have broken it up if we'd been obviously doing anything. As she was taking me back into her classroom (to separate the three of us), the second banana junior thug turned to me, his face bright red. "You're going to have to buy Doug a new cap!" Aparently his plastic baseball cap had been broken when I fought back when he jumped me. I laughed at him, which didn't do anything for his mood, but helped mine rather a lot. The teacher and I talked about it and then she gave me a note and sent me to my next class. You may wonder why this is listed under the politics category. I point you to this report about GOP Chairwoman Susan Weddington:
GOP Chairwoman Susan Weddington said the Democrats should pay the $2 million tab even though a Republican governor called the session specifically to increase Republican influence in Congress.
Bullies never change, and neither do their hangers-on.
.:Posted by Michael at 07:03 PM :.

July 30, 2003
The bipartisan spirit of the Texas SenatePolitics
Dewhurst presses ahead without quorum
"You're not going to see senators brought back in handcuffs as long as I am lieutenant governor," Dewhurst said.
Ah, yes, the famed Texas Senate bipartisanship is now a pledge not to handcuff minority party Senators. Thank you, Tom DeLay. Of course Dewhurst was against redistricting this spring and against breaking the 2/3rds tradition in June. We'll see if he makes it a trifecta of broken promises about maintaining Senate bipartisanship.
.:Posted by Michael at 07:30 PM :.

July 28, 2003
This just in...Politics
U.C. Berkeley psychologists identify causes of conservatism In "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition", four researchers at Berkeley identified the following psychological causes of political conservatism:
  • Fear and aggression
  • Dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity
  • Uncertainty avoidance
  • Need for cognitive closure
  • Terror management
It is unclear if the Berkeley psychologists intend to blame society or conservatives' parents. I have not been to the Heritage Foundation Website yet to see if they have a list of causes of liberalism.
.:Posted by Michael at 02:55 PM | :.

May 23, 2003
What is the Secret to (DPS Political Abuse) Comedy?Politics
Timing! Off the Kuff talks about the various messes, lies, and destruction of evidence in the DPS's efforts to enforce the Republican invitation for 51 Texas House democrats to return to Austin. Here's a detail that I haven't seen get much play in the press, yet. And I was all ready to assume that it was just an overzealous flunky.
At 9:39 a.m. on May 14, the DPS ordered all records of the search to be destroyed. DPS claims the records were destroyed because the investigation was over, but the House did not drop the order to arrest the wayward members until 11:25 a.m. --The Houston Chronicle
I am finding all this extremely entertaining. Someone needs to tell the repubs what the phrase 'maintaining the moral high-ground' means. I'm not sure they ever had it, but they probably can't go to their whack-job right-wing base and say "we convinced law-enforcement to intervene in a political dispute, but they failed us."
.:Posted by Michael at 06:05 PM :.

Tom DeLay: outstanding in his fieldPolitics
"I'm not giving up," DeLay said. "And I will not be intimidated. This is not over yet."
Well, that eases my mind. I know I certainly will sleep better at night knowing that Tom DeLay's lonely one man fight for partisan advantage against justice, precendent, and fairness using nothing but the powers of the Office of the Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives will not be stopped or even slowed by 'intimidating' questions like "isn't that illegal?" or "shouldn't you be doing your own job?" or "why don't you just go back to Washington?" I'm sure all right-thinking people will agree with me. This is certainly a relief.
.:Posted by Michael at 02:24 PM | :.

May 16, 2003
Why DPS was worried about Pete Laney!Politics
They were afraid he'd fly to Mena, Arkansas.
.:Posted by Michael at 12:44 PM :.

Texas House Playing Cards--The Full DeckPolitics
Jessica-8C.gif
The Texas GOP produced
Democratic Playing Cards
The official cards are not as well done as the deck binkley found by Alan K. Henderson, but they do give Juan Escobar a card (without a picture). Interestingly, while Henderson's deck is arranged by District Number, there is no apparent order to the GOP Deck. They do understand, at least, that the Joker was Representative Dunnam of Waco. Also of note: In the GOP deck, there isn't an African-American rep who is on a spade. Coincidence, sensitivity, or desire not to step in a bear-trap? Unknown, but an interesting datapoint nonetheless.
.:Posted by Michael at 12:12 PM | :.

More Fallout from Texas WalkoutPolitics
Apparently Tom DeLay is getting the heat for the calling in federal authorities to help enforce a Texas House rule. Even if he has legal plausible deniability, politically, he's not getting away lightly. I haven't mentioned this before, but there's certainly going to be fallout from all this in the US House as well. Those five Texas dems who won't be redistricted away now have no reason not to go after DeLay as hard as they can. Speaker DeLay, if you're gonna bushwack Texans, best be sure you can kill them. Quotes from the CBS Story:
[F]ederal officials say the police in Texas "have a lot of explaining to do."
... "with Vivian Vance as Tom Craddick"
.:Posted by Michael at 10:42 AM :.

Nice Column Molly, but that one sentence has too many vowels...Politics
Molly Ivins strikes again! From, of all places, the Washington Post:
They are, at long last, the perfect unpoliticians -- they don't compromise, they don't deal, they don't look for the middle way, they don't give a damn about accommodating anybody else. Because they believe they're right. And they won't go out for a beer after work. They think it's them against evil. And everybody who ain't them is evil. These are Shiite Republicans.

Since all of y'all in the North think Texas is eternally screwed up, I'm not going to try to defend this lunacy (although it has causes), I'm just warning you: This is about to happen everywhere. A good country song says, "Lubbock on Everythang." Make it bigger, expand that. "Texas on Everythang." The whole country is being turned into the state whose proudest boast is that sometimes we're ahead of Mississippi.

When our governor, Rick "Goodhair" Perry (that's a head of hair every Texan can be proud of, regardless of party), asked New Mexico to arrest any escapees lurking there, the state's attorney general, Patricia Madrid, said, "I have put out an all-points bulletin for law enforcement to be on the lookout for politicians in favor of health care and against tax cuts for the wealthy."
And she also makes me miss Ann Richards:"Ann Richards recently observed that the price of gasoline has gotten so high that Texas women who want to run over their husbands have to carpool."
.:Posted by Michael at 10:21 AM :.

National Fallout from Texas WalkoutPolitics
Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo is doing a good job of covering the dustup over the use of The Department of Homeland Security to track Pete Laney's plane. Before it became clear that it might be bad to say so, locating Pete's plane was the official explanation for how the Dems were located. Currently, it looks like TxDPS tricked DepHomeSec into involvement in an Intra-state political affair. I feel for DepHomeSec, because if TxDPS called me and asked for help looking for a missing plane with senior state government officials on it, I'd want to help them, too. If they knew it was political, then somebody should get fired, of course. Still, it looks pretty bad for a major new security organization to be dupeable in the first place. Knowing how to get DepHomeSec to provide the location of a private plane might be useful to terrorists. There's plenty of fingerpointing and CYA going on to determine if the TxDPS officer who called DepHomeSec was mendaciously creative all by himself or if there were one or more Speakers named Tom involved. Ginger thinks DeLay wasn't involved, but reminds us that he favored federal involvement. Instapundit has also chimed in. Glenn's points on DepHomeSec are cogent, especially the update where he states that "if there were a valid federal statute proscribing interstate flight to avoid a quorum call, then it would be [a federal matter]." He's not convinced that such a statute would be "within the scope of Congress's enumerated powers". I hope not. That, btw, is the best Instapundit article I've read in a year.
.:Posted by Michael at 09:48 AM | :.

May 14, 2003
Got Dems?Politics
This is really funny. This picture is from the Austin American-Statesman and was taken by Ken Herman. That's the Texas House chamber behind the milk cartons. At least whoever made the milk cartons knew who was responsible for the walkout. I wouldn't put it past either the republicans or the democratic staffers.
Three notes:
  • I believe that's Garnet Coleman (Joker, D-Houston) on the left
  • I'm pretty sure that's Jim Dunnam (2H, D-Waco) on the right
  • Oak Farms Milk tastes sorta chalky, especially the reduced fat variety
.:Posted by Michael at 11:06 PM :.

The JokerPolitics
People keep talking about me baby
Say I'm doing you wrong, doing you wrong
Jessica Farrar
The Full Deck
I'm not worried that my representative is doing me wrong. I'm happy. My rep is doing what I want her to be doing, which is using every tool in the toolbox to keep Tom DeLay from running over us all. Again. That's Jessica Farrar, who took over my district when the House Redistricting of 2000 kept me from re-electing Debra Danburg, who had previously served me well. The Republicans in the Texas House made playing cards (and Milk Cartons) of the missing Dems. She got the Joker, which is great, since the joke seems to be on the so-called House Leadership which led us into this. As Kuff notes, Irma Rangel (8H, D-San Antonio) died in March. Her card should have been replaced with Singin' Juan Escobar. Via Binkley (he of the awful drifting background colors) from Alan K. Henderson. I would be very interested in seeing the actual house deck (this is not it), but thanks to Alan for the nifty stand-in.
.:Posted by Michael at 10:56 PM | :.

I wonder what the Party of Lincoln thinks of this?Politics
While we're talking history, I'd be remiss not to mention the story of Abe Lincoln, Quorum Buster:
In December 1840 the Illinois Democrats wanted to require the bank to make payments in gold or silver instead of paper. The bank was authorized to continue its suspension of specie payment through the end of the year. Lincoln wanted desperately to avoid this outcome, so he bolted for the door and instructed his fellow Whigs to follow him. Without a quorum the legislature could not vote to adjourn, and the suspension of specie payment would continue. But the door was locked and guarded, so Lincoln literally jumped out of the first-floor window, followed by his lemming-like Whig followers. The Democrats ridiculed him as "Lincoln and his flying brethren," and his stunt failed anyway.
The Party of Lincoln is up in arms about the Texas Democrat's using Lincoln's tactics. That's about as reasonable as the Church of England opposing royal divorce. Oh, wait, they used to... via The Daily Kos
.:Posted by Michael at 11:45 AM :.

Ardmore and ArbroathPolitics
The 53 Killer Ds who are breaking the Texas House Quorum in Ardmore Oklahoma have issued a declaration describing their principles and the reasons behind their actions. Read the declaration and the accompanying letter. However, as an amateur historian with a personal interest in Scotland, I can't help but compare it to sentiments of a group of rebellious Scottish Earls and Barons some 683 years ago.
A Declaration in Defense of Self-Determination [...] In our democracy, power rests with the people. The founding documents of our nation declare the self-evidence of this natural law. Government is only as strong as the people who choose their representatives through elections, through their consent granting government its legitimacy. [...] Issued May 13, 2003 at Ardmore, Oklahoma
The 53 signatories (8 earls and 45 barons) to the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320 seemed to have similar concerns on their minds.
[I]f he [King Robert of Scotland, aka Robert the Bruce] should give up what he has begun, and agree to make us or our kingdom subject to the King of England or the English, we should exert ourselves at once to drive him out as our enemy and a subverter of his own rights and ours, and make some other man who was well able to defend us our King; for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom ? for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
There you have it. The right to rule is derived from the consent of the governed. Next time you have a chance, thank a Scot.
.:Posted by Michael at 11:22 AM :.

Nothing to say but that's OKPolitics
The standoff continues and people either love Jim Dunnam and hate Tom, Tom and Rick or vice versa. The vox populi sections of the media all mostly echo either the Ds or the Rs. What I can't tell is if any of the people talking are going to switch or if it's just the same partisans (like me) who haven't changed at all. Check out the highway section of district 1 along I-10 near Houston. While I am sure the gas stations and convenience stores on the way to the gambling havens of the Louisiana border form a community of interest of sorts, I think this map looks unconsititutional.
.:Posted by Michael at 10:39 AM :.

May 13, 2003
Ahem.Politics
Now that Texas has your attention... Please read Molly Ivins.
Believe me, stopping the legislature from functioning at this point is high public service.
Amen, sister.
.:Posted by Michael at 02:02 PM | :.

Pat Haggerty for Speaker of the Texas House...Politics
Not every democratic state rep fled Austin this weekend, but not every Republican wants to be locked in the Capitol, waiting for DPS to drag the Killer Ds back. Don't confuse this with dewey-eyed liberal-appeasement, it's just politics. El Paso Republican Pat Haggerty would rather get on with things than fight a scorched-earth war with Democrats. Imagine that.
"This is sheer stupidity," Rep. Pat Haggerty, R-El Paso, said of the lockdown. He wanted to be liberated. [...] Haggerty acknowledged that he would've been better off with his Democrat colleagues than being placed under a form of House arrest. "When this goes down in history (the Democrats) will be heroes, and we'll be a bunch of schmucks," Haggerty said.
Haggerty would make a good speaker, don't you think? He knows when to fold and not play out a bad hand. NP:Let My People Go-go--The Rainmakers
.:Posted by Michael at 11:22 AM :.

Sausage FactoryPolitics
The Texas House of Representatives will reconvene at 9AM tomorrow to hope that their missing members return.
.:Posted by Michael at 12:16 AM :.

May 12, 2003
This just in: Dems cancel ChrismasPolitics
"They are spoiling the day for school children who are making a once-in-a-lifetime visit to the state Capitol with their class, and would like be recognized by their hometown lawmaker." -- House Speaker Tom Craddick, R-Midland.
Sadly, Speaker Craddick seems to be unaware of how many Texans think of the legislature as a (barely) necessary evil. When my father speaks about his work as a law student in the offices of the East Texas democrat Webster Glass, he recites an old Texas mantra:
"No one's wife, liberty, or property are safe when the legislature was in session."
There's a reason Texas restricts them from meeting more than 140 days every two years.
.:Posted by Michael at 09:00 PM | :.

With Friends Like These...Politics
Apparently Governor Goodhair has asked New Mexico for help in locating the Killer Ds, 53 Texas legislators who broke the House quorum and shut down legislative business just 4 days before the last new bill could be considered. The AG of our neigbor to the west, Patricia Madrid said:
"Texas should understand that since ski season is over, the Santa Fe Opera has not begun and President Bush was just in town, I don't think they are in Santa Fe now. Nevertheless, I have put out an all-points bulletin for law enforcement to be on the look out for politicians in favor of health care for the needy and against tax cuts for the wealthy."
If they're not in Santa Fe, they should head there as soon as they can. It may have a better climate in May than Austin. For those playing at home, the last two walkouts were 1979 about making the primaries safe for party-switcher John Connaly and 1911 about prohibition. For those wondering if this is politically smart, I quote House Speaker Tom Craddick (R-Midland) "I'm not interested in negotiating." Indeed. If there is no negotiating and then what have they got to lose by blocking the steamroller?
.:Posted by Michael at 08:46 PM :.

April 29, 2003
The propriety of children in business situationsPolitics
Ginger and Ampersand have been discussing a case where a faculty member came in from maternity leave to be a part of an interview panel for a candidate for a faculty position. The woman brought her child and, during the interview, proceeded to nurse the baby. Ampersand argues that "no-babies-at-meetings ethic is leftover from an older and sexist world" and that "[s]aying that a parent-with-infant cannot attend such a meeting is an unfair burden on parents". I disagree. Miss Manners says "Babies do not belong at work or at adult social events" (page 227) and she's absolutely right. I come at this from a high-tech manager's perspective in a Fortune 300 company, so some of what I think is probably not relevant to the actual case, which involves a woman in an academic position. As a manager I am willing to make reasonable accommodations for my employee's families, but I don't think this is a reasonable accommodation. As a manager, I'd be really annoyed at my employee who pulled a stunt like this when she was a panel member. Depending on how it had happened, I might not say anything beyond reminding the interviewer that the company had a policy against children in the workplace. It might depend on how much pressure I'd put on her to make herself available while on leave to attend this interview. My initial reaction to this is that, as a manager, I don't need anyone's opinion so badly that they should have to come in from leave to provide it. The employee is on leave because she cannot fulfill her job obligations due to the need of (in this case) her infant child. It's a company benefit (mandated by the government, but still) that she is taking advantage of to provide that care for her child. It's likely that even asking her to come off leave is a potential FMLA violation, especially if she isn't willing to do so or has stated that she will come back at some later date. If she cannot be separated from her dependent child for long enough to conduct the interview, then I will not require her to do so. It's also worth looking at how this behavior affects my search to fill the vacancy in my department. Having this candidate before a panel interview means he (in this case) has already passed a resume screen, and two phone screens (one by HR and one by a department member) at a minimum. We've invested quite a bit in this candidate and are strongly considering hiring him. We think he's close enough that we're willing to take the time of a group of otherwise busy professionals to interview him. We may have flown him in from out of state. I need someone now (we never hired beyond our needs). This is a costly process. If it were cheap and easy, HR wouldn't have a directive to reduce turnover. And my employee has disrupted it. Thanks. Disrupted. She may not have derailed it, but she's increased my costs in filling my position. Some candidates might not accept an offer on the basis of "that's not the kind of place I want to work". Some might want more money. Some might accept, but not get along well with my employee. I have to spend some time thinking about my response. I'll probably talk to a peer or mentor in management about "this happened, how do you think I should respond". I may end up talking to HR about it. It may affect team morale, which will affect productivity, especially if her coworkers think she got special privileges regarding her child. I may have to deal with other interviewees who are worried/upset about her behavior. Again, how I deal with this will depend on if I was out of line in suggesting it in the first place. It's not out of the question that the employer could be sued. Suppose the candidate claims that this was religious or gender based discrimination designed to prevent him from performing well enough at the job interview to obtain the job he was clearly qualified for? Whatever the merits of the case, I don't want to fight that. My department has lots to do and we're already understaffed. The expectations of workplace behavior are commonly known and also explictly spelled out in HR documents. Children in the workplace are frowned upon, but permissible in emergency situations (which this was not), assuming they are properly behaved. Don't make me ask HR to send a memo.
.:Posted by Michael at 01:50 PM | :.

April 23, 2003
Texas vs. LawrencePolitics
Inspired by this thread on the newly redesigned Blogcritics web site, I have a few comments on Texas vs. Lawrence. The Texas vs. Lawrence case involves the Texas anti-sodomy law, which specifies that sodomy is only illegal between people of the same sex. A law that makes an act that is legal for members of one group to perform illegal for members of another group to perform is inherently discriminatory. The question is 'is this illegal discrimination?' Some discrimination is fine. It is legal to discriminate against 10 year olds who wish to vote. It is legal for the VA to discriminate against non-veterans who want free governement healthcare. There is a compelling state interest in discriminating that overrides the harm done to the discriminated class. Senator Rick Santorum attempts to define this state interest by asserting that protecting gays from this discrimination will de facto protect bigamists, polygamists, people committing incest, and adulterers. It is clear under Texas law that all sodomy is not harmful, since it is no longer illegal between consenting adults if they are of opposite sexes. All Santorum has is the rather weak 'gateway' argument. I don't think there is any merit to his position, because bigamy is illegal regardless of gender or orientation. Striking the Texas sodomy law because it illegally discriminates would be laudable. It would not inherently establish a right to privacy (regardless of the merits of such a right) and it would not invalidate existing laws against gender-and-orientation-blind behavior. Senator Santorum may not be the homophobe that he's being painted, but he does a poor job of determining the harm done by a discriminatory law and he is far too willing to invade the bedrooms of consenting adults. I suspect he is not particularly different from John Ashcroft in this. It's run of the mill odiousness, not a particular stench that belongs to Santorum alone.
.:Posted by Michael at 09:39 PM :.

April 14, 2003
Further evidence of the Onionification of Real LifeMusic
According to a BBC journalist in Baghdad, RIAA Lobbyist Hilary B. Rosen is rewriting the intellectual property laws for the new government of Iraq. Why do I bother trying to write satire when it's indistinguishable from actual events? Tom Lehrer retired from performing music because "Political satire became obsolete when Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize." I know how he felt. (via Democracy Now site not updated with 4/13 program info yet...) Cross posted to BlogCritics
.:Posted by Michael at 10:24 AM :.

March 30, 2003
Framing the debate or framing your opponents?Politics
On another list, Savok wrote:
[W]hy are the left almost supporting someone who uses chemical weapons on his own people and destroys entire ecological systems pretty much leaving the people there for dead because they piss him off?
We were probably in the wrong forum and I wanted to preserve my thoughts, so they'll go here. We'd been discussing political disconnects and how we couldn't think of any comic strips that were funny, insightful, and appealed to both the left and the right of the political spectrum. Turns out that his idea of who was 'the left" and mine were sorta different, probably owing to the fact that he's from Australia and I'm from Texas. My response is below. (More: ...)
.:Posted by Michael at 10:04 AM :.

March 18, 2003
CNN headline sets just the right tonePolitics
World braces as deadline looms
Terror alert level raised; March Madness may be delayed
I'm not sure if I can think of anything sarcastic enough to say about "March Madness". UPDATE:They changed the subhead. Perhaps people complained.
.:Posted by Michael at 09:57 AM :.

March 17, 2003
Who needs a hobby like Tennis or PhilatelyPolitics
CNN reaches oh, perhaps 1999 or so with this breaking story: File-sharing sites allow trading of porn. Let's hope they don't discover Usenet. I'd hate to see their reaction to alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.prostitution.congresscritters-and-rich-
lobbyists.waxman.RIAA via Sortelli (author of Elf Only Inn)
.:Posted by Michael at 09:53 AM :.

February 25, 2003
Bernadette Devlin "a potential or real threat to the United States."Politics
Jimmy Breslin reports on INS agents who deported former British MP and civil rights activist Bernadette Devlin MacAlisky. That this 55 year old grandmother is considered "a potential or real threat to the United States" justifies the fears that government will abuse the extraordinary powers it assumed in the name of security after 9/11. Puh-leeze. It's pretty clear that the only thing she's done 'wrong' is oppose the administration position on war. I encourage you to write your congresspeople and the AG and denounce this arbitrary abuse of assumed powers. And, of course, this shows the extreme foolhardiness of Congress and the Clinton administration in passing the immigration reform act in 1996 (IIRIRA). "Checks and Balances" are supposed to be what make our goverment inherently protective of our liberties and this act removed the "check and balance" of judicial review from the INS. "Streamlining" government by removing impediments to illegal acts by it is like making a car go faster by removing the brakes.
Those who would trade essential liberties for a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." -Benjamin Franklin
.:Posted by Michael at 10:49 AM :.

September 14, 2002
Watching an anti-American protestPolitics
There were a couple of dozen of them, lined up across the street with their signs. It's not a big turnout, we said to ourselves. They're new at this, we decided. Only two or three of them worked up the nerve or the vitriol to even shout at us. Mostly they took photographs, mostly of each other. One year ago this week thousands died in New York City. Today the protesters I saw had signs that called for:
God's Judgement on America for Murdering the Innocent
Which is almost exactly what Osama bin Laden said in this interview from Nov 10th, 2001
God's Judgement on America for Tolerating Sodomy
In Texas, it's only legally tolerated when performed by heterosexual couples. I'm not sure we're staying on message here, people...
GOD will not Bless a Wicked Nation
Jerry Falwell was named MAD Magazine's Dumbest Person of 2001 for blaming the Sept. 11th attacks on gays, lesbians, feminists and other people he considers 'wicked'. These advocates of religious hatred of the United States for our policies might never personally kill or bomb anyone, but others do, for the cause. The vast majority of their co-religionists don't support the violence or the hatred of the US. Many are loyal Americans and a bunch of them are fighting and dying to preserve the American way of life. There are a lot of reasonable, thoughtful people who would never hold signs like that but who agree with these people on some of their (other) key principles. I wasn't in Karachi or Kabul or even Canada. I was in Houston, Texas. I was at a Planned Parenthood Clinic that, amongst the other medical services it offers, does indeed perform abortions. Calling on God to destroy America because you are offended by her policies, even if they promote "toleration" and "wickedness" is despicable. These religious fanatics are free to hold and even promote their anti-american agenda, but they bring disrepute to any cause they are associated with. This wasn't a high-profile national protest for the evening news. It wasn't even covered, which is fine. But I don't think their grass-roots call for the Judgement of God on Wicked America should go uncondemned.
.:Posted by Michael at 11:06 PM | :.

August 11, 2002
Blasphemous Rumors...Politics
Nazareth News (Nazareth, FL) November 27th Edition, 1 B.C.
Serving Greater Nazareth since 23 B.C. Statutorily Required Notice of Intent to Surrender a Child for Adoption I. Mary of Nazareth, intend to put up my child, whom I expect to bear in late December, for adoption at the Bethlehem Adoption Center. As required by Florida low, I am posting this notice because I have exhausted all efforts to locate the father. I am 5'2" tall, approximately 140 lbs and have dark hair and an olive complexion. In early March, 1 B.C., I met someone calling himself "The Holy Spirit". He came over me several times in Temple and several times in my parents own home. If The Holy Spirit, or whatever his real name is, wishes to contest my decision to give up our child for adoption, he should contact Joseph of the house and lineage of David, Nazareth, Florida.
M:"There. It complies with the stupid florida law. Um, Joseph..." J:"Yeah, you were right. Rip it up, we'll keep the kid. What did you want to call it." M: "Him. Jesus." J: "Or maybe we'll just abandon him at any Hospital, Fire Station or EMS Station with complete immunity from prosecution and anonymity, as long as he hasn't been abused. M: "So, in Florida, if I want to give up my baby for adoption with complete medical records, I have to publish this notice that humilates and degrades both of us, but if I leave him at a fire station, it's all good?" J: "Yeah, we're moving to Mississippi. Maybe it'll be better there." via What She Really Thinks and News We Can Use
.:Posted by Michael at 11:21 PM | :.

August 02, 2002
The Scarlet "L"Politics
The Lefty Directory lists those of us on the web who are in the pink-to-red camp. Since liberals are soon to be the dominant political force in the US, I recommend that our contrarian forces comfort themselves (if it is indeed legal in their state to do so) with The Foremen's Ain't No Liberal. via Chuck
.:Posted by Michael at 05:01 PM :.

July 24, 2002
"d00d, I thought they were archiving my blogs, honest."Politics
The Register points out the wonderful folly of Bergman (D-Calif) and Coble (R-NC)'s proposed legislation that protects copyright holders from damages if they hack your system. All they have to do is claim that they had reasonable suspicion that you were infringing their rights and their intrusion and any collateral damage they cause is protected! While at first this may seem to be allowing digital vigilanteism, consider that as a blog author, I am a producer of copyrighted content which might be available on a "publicly accessible peer-to-peer network", such as the World Wide Web's TCP/IP network. So, as long as I tell the AG about it in advance, this law will prevent Google, which regularly copies my files, from suing me if I DOS them or hijack their domain. Brilliant!
Oh, this is going to be one fabulous piece of legislation, all right. Personally, I can hardly wait for it to be passed into law. I'll be sure to thank Hillary Rosen when I'm legally breaking in to the RIAA network, searching for illicit copies of my articles.
I agree with Greene, it will be amazingly hard to write this stupid legislation in such a way that it allows the hacking proposed without allowing all hacking. At least not without some awfully funny language...
.:Posted by Michael at 04:50 PM :.

July 22, 2002
Fantasy JobPolitics
Must as I'd rather not quote The Washington Times, I couldn't help thinking about this quote when I was commenting on the Homeland Security Creation article that Unqualified Offerings found.
Mr. Armey's bill also would create a "privacy officer" in the Homeland Security Department, which he said was the first ever established by law in a Cabinet agency. Mr. Armey said this person would "ensure technology research and new regulations from the department respect the civil liberties our citizens enjoy."
Tom: Hi, Michael, you ready for your performance review? Me : Yes, sir. I've been on the job for 12 months now, and I think we're right on track. Tom: I agree, I've been very pleased. Let's go over your job description and your accomplishments. Me : Yes, sir. My primary function is to review research and regulations supported by this department to make sure they respect civil liberties. Tom: Yes, and your accomplishments? Me : I've read 183 regulations and reviewed 37 research projects. Tom: And how many had to be modified as a result of your reviews? Me : Sir? None. Tom: None? Me : None. Tom: Excellent. Well, your review is 'perfect'. Keep up the good work. Me : Thank you, sir. May I say that many people would have trouble with a job where they were 'required' to provide oversight to make sure the bosses' decisions weren't illegal. Tom: Well, you're well qualified for it, Michael. All those years at Arthur Anderson...
.:Posted by Michael at 05:00 PM :.

Two-and-a-half-cheers for Dick ArmeyPolitics
Unqualified Offerings asks his liberal friends to applaud Dick Armey for removing several of the more egregious items from the bill authorizing the Homeland Security Department. Dick added a provision banning national identity cards and another banning a proposed national fink-out program, whereby your mail carrier might look in your windows so that you could be turned in to Homeland Security for a fat reward. Good on ya, Dick. I echo the ACLU in their praise of these points. "These are two programs that bother me," Armey said. I can't recommend UO's source, which portrays the valiant Armey standing staunch against the excesses of gummint by his lonesome. I do recommend this much more mundane description of how politics functions to reach compromise, from The Washington Post. UO quotes The Washington Times, that bastion of journalistic integrity.
.:Posted by Michael at 04:40 PM :.

June 29, 2002
Welcome to (Upton Sinclair's) The Jungle...Politics
The Talking Dog clearly understands the problem with the 9th Circuit's decision: It exposes the practical compromise of our principles that is required to allow society to function.
We Northern1 liberal pointy-heads just have to suck it up on certain things, such as “In God We Trust” in our courtrooms and on our money, for what is mostly a good deal for us (generally, constitutionally protected personal freedoms).
Our elected officials have made it quite clear that they will not stand for someone showing us how sausage is made. The Rabid Dog, a reader who used to be a regular contributor to The Talking Dog, has exposed the meat of the debate very clearly in his response
[T]he sole basis for the public outcry against the Pledge ruling is that it is suppresses an expression of a passionate and literal belief in a living, breathing, all-powerful deity.  The anger is not that Mr. Newdow has made much out of something trivial or meaningless, but that he has refused to acknowledge the truth of a very important belief that the majority of Americans hold dear.
Let's see if the courts can protect us from the tyrrany of the majority.
[1]We Southern (or in my case Texan) liberal pointy-haids have a similar but different set of things we have to suck up to get what liberty we can...
.:Posted by Michael at 12:33 PM :.

It depends on what 'God' is...Politics
Busy, Busy, Busy says that legal scholars find the 9th Circuit decision to be reasonable, and proposes that, rather than change the words of the pledge and the motto on the money, the compromise solution should be to redefine God.
God \God\ (g[o^]d),unk? [org: undefined by U.S. Congress 2002] 1. A generic metaphor for nothing in particular. 2. A solemn ceremonial word devoid of any meaning. 3. A reference to zero or more things about which nothing is known.
A brilliant solution: The 'God' reference is only constitutional if 'God' is a meaningless word! I cannot wait for the Supreme Court to declare 'God' meaningless.
.:Posted by Michael at 11:40 AM | :.

June 27, 2002
Religion and the StatePolitics
And while we're looking at the Pledge of Allegiance, we should also discard the opinions of Congress, which has been wobbly on the Establishment Clause since Day One. Day One being the day in 1789 they swore in the first Congressional Chaplains.
Could a Catholic clergyman ever hope to be appointed a [Congressional] Chaplain! To say that his religious principles are obnoxious or that his sect is small, is to lift the evil at once and exhibit in its naked deformity the doctrine that religious truth is to be tested by numbers or that the major sects have a right to govern the minor. --From James Madison Detached Memoranda (bef 1832)
Things are much different now, of course. Just ask Father Tim O'Brian, the Catholic clergyman who didn't get the post in 1999...
.:Posted by Michael at 01:50 AM :.

Should Nine Year Olds be Pledging Allegiance at all, with or without God?Politics
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
When I was 9, it was 1976 and I lived in suburban Houston, Texas. We said the Pledge of Allegiance every day. I didn't know any better. I was 9. We were all, after all, Bicentennially patriotic. The fire hydrants were red, white and blue. Everything was. Here's what I promised, at age 9, 180 state-mandated days a year for 12 years.
I made a binding promise of my fidelity to the symbol and the government it stood for, a government subordinate to God, which I believe is indivisible and should provide liberty and justice for all.
As a Texan, I suppose I should be more concerned about that indivisible part than about God. I've never liked the God bit and it was a cold-war add-in when we were fighting "Godless Communists." It rankles because it comes right where indivisible was and it divides us. Even that isn't the foremost concern when I think about the Pledge. What I'm really struggling with right now is how it is that children too young to enter into most forms of binding legal arrangements are required to promise fidelity to the government. I'm not wondering about the school's mission to create good citizens, I'm looking for a theoretical justification for the several thousand promises I made, in public, to my government, when I was below the age where I could enter into binding legal agreements.
.:Posted by Michael at 01:24 AM :.

Speaking of Claims that won't stand...Politics
The Chronk copyrights the Pledge of Alegiance...
June 26, 2002, 2:28PM The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag© Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle
.:Posted by Michael at 01:04 AM :.

June 12, 2002
Quoth the Raven 'Livermore!'Politics
The Register, following the SF Cronk, notes that the Homeland Security department gets 80% of the budget of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The bizarro thing is that it gets 4% of the staff. Maybe the Bushies are giving the 4% a big raise, or maybe it goes to Cheney to replace his stock options. Perhaps it goes to fund seekrit plans. Geez, at least that would mean they'd noticed that they were gutting one of the core technology centers of the US. Sadly, I think it means 'the administration is run by morons.' I mean, really.
.:Posted by Michael at 11:14 AM :.

April 09, 2002
Political Activism in the Naughts...Politics
Electronic communication being what it is, I found and bothered all three of the contenders to replace outgoing national and state embarrassment Phil Gramm. I'm cautiously optimistic, because
  • It can't get worse that Gramm
  • Cornyn has a better track record than most
  • Ron Kirk also looks reasonable.
Maybe this time next year, Kay Bailey will be the most whacked Texas Senator. Oh, and I asked the Cornyn campaign about S.2048, the "Screw consumers and treat them all like criminals to protect Disney's failing business model for selling music Act" (spelled "Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act" in Washington and at the bank...). I am tentatively pleased with their reply:
Michael - based on an analysis of the bill, I don't think John Cornyn would support the measure. While the desire to protect intellectual property is important, this bill could strangle innovation and not improve the protection of intellectual property as intended. Matt Winslow John Cornyn for Senate
.:Posted by Michael at 09:50 PM | :.

February 18, 2002
The Committee for the Suppression of Vice and the Promotion of Virtue, Kiwi ChapterPolitics
It's probably a bad idea for anyone to watch porn movies on-line from the office, even if you're the boss, even with the current trend that says that home life and work life are no longer as seperate as the once were. It's certainly disturbing when it's a senior judge in a place like New Zealand. One doesn't want to think that any public servant sits around his office watching any on-line movie at taxpayer expense. Now, Justice Robert Fisher has admitted that it was inappropriate and he's apologized. So says The Register, my favorite technology news site. What is disturbing is that the dustup over this isn't about his use of taxpayer time and equipment to watch porn, it's with his viewing porn at all. Wellington Women's Refuge, a women's shelter in New Zealand, is calling for Justice Fisher's removal because it's

"...not appropriate to have a judge with pro-pornography views on the bench.

Justice Fisher showed that he was not capable of judging crimes, which degraded women, such as sexual abuse and rape..."
So because a Justice has watched a porn movie, he is not capable of judging crimes against women? Does this mean that if he watched Traffic, he'd be unfit to judge drug cases? If he watched Batman and Robin, he couldn't judge cases of vigilanteism? If he watched Glitter, he'd be unqualified to judge crimes against good taste? I'll concede the last one. It's worse than that, actually. The flaw with this is that the supposed tie between pornography and violence against women is the result of flawed social science promulgated by politicians with not-particularly-hidden agendas. Ed Meese's President's Commission on Pornography is one of the prime sources of this misinformation. Here are several links about this false connection.
  • Fake Science and Pornography--by Avedon Carol, of Feminists Against Censorship
  • The Meese Commision had a"...mandate to overturn the 1970 Presidential Commission on Pornography's finding that there is no evidence of a link between sexually explicit materials and delinquent or criminal behavior"--The Obscene, Disgusting, and Vile Meese Commission Report
    --by Pat Calfia
  • LIE: "How do people become pedophiles? Usually, pornography walks you down that path until you get to the place where you've seen everything that a man and a woman can do together, and then you make that little jump over to perversions." --JAMES DOBSON, FOCUS ON THE FAMILY FACT: "The FBI has no evidence that pornography causes crimes. Pedophilia has absolutely nothing to do with adult pornography." --FBI AGENT KEN LANNING
    from The Sex Lies of the Religious Right
  • "Even the pro-censorship Meese Commission Report admitted that the data connecting pornography to violence was unreliable." A FEMINIST OVERVIEW OF PORNOGRAPHY, ENDING IN A DEFENSE THEREOF by Wendy McElroy
It strikes me as a damn shame when otherwise sensible feminists get suckered into supporting the unwarranted assertions of the religious right, a group that is not exactly known for stalwartly defending feminist positions.
.:Posted by Michael at 12:50 PM :.

December 28, 2001
There are two things never to argue with Martin Gardner about...Politics
And the other one is Alice In Wonderland Steven Den Beste writes a long, interesting essay on Policies that produce the opposite result. Certainly this is a worthwhile consideration and is based on a great example from Martin Gardner's Mathematical Games. As Mr Den Beste puts it...(emphasis mine)
The idea was that a Sheik in an Arab country was concerned about the fact that there weren't enough marriageable women around so that every man could fulfill his spiritual duty to have more than one wife. So he declared that in his kingdom every family would be permitted to have no more than one boy. After their first boy was born, they would be required to stop having children. Images of families with huge numbers of daughters and only one son danced in his head. Gardner's comment was that in fact the result of this would be a preponderance of males. You start with the fact that every birth is a 50:50 toss, and the most common family configuration, about half, would be a single male child. Then you have a quarter of them with one girl and one boy, a quarter with two girls and one boy, an eighth with three girls and one boy, and so on. In order for the numbers of boys and girls to come back into equality it was necessary to take the series to infinity. So far from this policy providing more women to marry, it would instead cause a shortage. ...[H]is analysis is faulty anyway, because in fact each birth would be a separate event governed by the laws of probability, because the sex of any child is not affected by how many siblings have already been born into that family. In reality, such a policy would have no effect at all on the sex mix. But it was an interesting idea: a policy which would have the exact opposite effect that was planned. We see those around us every day.
Now I could just write this off as a failure to understand conditional probability or perhaps as an error in an aside that doesn't really need nitpicking, but I decided instead to prove it by writing a program. The table below makes an estimate and then runs the numbers, with a 50/50 chance of a boy or a girl in every birth and a slightly smaller number of girls in the population for the very reasons Gardner explained. Note that it is entirely possible, even likely, to get some runs that produce more girls than boys. It is just more likely to produce slightly fewer girls. Next (maybe): A Javascript proof of the advantage of switching in the Monty Hall problem (or I'd rather switch than fight)
Number of Families/
Number of Boys:
Number of Girls:Estimated:Random:
Ratio:Minimum:Maximum:
Number of Families with...Minimum Girls:Maximum Girls:
.:Posted by Michael at 11:36 PM :.

December 15, 2001
Unrepentant Fenian BastardPolitics
Is some terrorism different from others? Punditocracy has discovered Senchaí and the Unity Squad, a New York "Rebel Hip-Hop" band fronted by former Black 47 front man Chris Byrne. Chris used to be a NYPD officer stationed in Times Square. He's been attending funerals recently and writing songs about it. He is undoubtably an authentic voice. Unqualified Offerings notes that Willaim S. Repsher of The NYPress.com favors Gates of Hell over Neil Young's Let's Roll. Musically, I'm with Repsher. I prefer the hip-hop informed celtic rock of Seanchaí to Neil Young. I think he's got a better take on the story, as well. So I have to start wondering. Seanchaí is a friend of Irish Republicanism, with links to Republican sites on his web page and who at one point turned down Reebok as tour sponsor because the Reebok logo includes the British flag. The British government is trying to pass anti-terrorism laws similar to the shiny new ones we have here. Laws which might consider Mr. Byrne a man who gave aid and comfort to terrorists. I first heard of Seanchaí when his song Fenians was new and controversial. It's a good song--stirring, nationalistic, and strongly anti-British. Love of freedom, culture, the British boot on the neck. "Sedition's our tradition and it won't just go away/Say it loud say it proud I will stay/an Unrepentant Fenian Bastard." Hate speech? Incitement to violence? Compare it to just ab