APCB is your one stop for weekend movie viewing recommendations. Now with excerpts!
The Village: ** out of ***** - "...not even Howard’s debut as a leading lady can disguise the fact that “The Village” is a horror movie with few chills, and that Shyamalan may be a one-trick pony rapidly running out of ideas."
Thunderbirds: *1/2 out of ***** - "“Thunderbirds” leads to more questions than can ever be answered. Such as: is there any lamer cover identity than “billionaire astronaut” (at least Bruce Wayne kept the Batcave secret)? Or, how does NATO or the UN feel about the geopolitical ramifications of having an orbiting intelligence platform in the hands of a private individual?"
The Manchurian Candidate **** out of ***** - "Conspiracy theory and corruption make up the new lingua franca of modern political dialogue, so none but the film’s more far out concepts will be too farfetched for today’s audiences. And lines like Voight’s assertion that Shaw may be the first corporate-owned Vice-President in history are likely to draw more snickers than gasps..."
See? Now you don't even have to read them.
My review of M. Night Shyamalan's latest most likely won't be up on Film Threat today, but since I know how crucial my opinion is to the moviegoing public, I thought I'd use another write-up to help outline my feelings. In this case, it's one I pulled from the AP wire, and I'm confused at to why someone would write such a fawning review of The Village and not at least put their name on it[1]:
Review: 'The Village' Is Shyamalan's Best
Where to begin in terms of the revelations in M. Night Shyamalan's "The Village"?
Let's start with Bryce Dallas Howard, daughter of director Ron Howard. With only stage roles and bit parts in her dad's movies beforehand, Howard delivers a radiant leading-lady debut that dominates the film and its excellent ensemble, which includes Joaquin Phoenix, William Hurt, Sigourney Weaver and Adrien Brody.
There are the usual Shyamalan twists, certainly not as jaw-dropping as the ending of "The Sixth Sense" but still intriguing. Some will see the big surprise coming, and some may find it flimsy, even laughable, the way many greeted the conclusion of Shyamalan's "Unbreakable."
Correction: Everyone will see the big surprise coming, not just because it is so clumsily telegraphed, but because people are expecting it. Shyamalan was able to make the endings to The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable work because the "shocking twist" thing in his movies was still a little fresh. Now, everyone knows it's coming, and the anticipation of the big reveal can't help but disappoint.
The reviewer's right about one thing; Bryce Howard is fantastic.
Yet unlike writer-director Shyamalan's previous films, including 2002's "Signs," the twists and gothic creepiness are not the payoff of "The Village." The rewards run much deeper in this simple story laced with a rich subtext and, like classic fairy tales, suffused with twilight terror and repressed carnality.
The real revelation is Shyamalan's growth as a storyteller, advancing from a modern Rod Serling specializing in "Twilight Zone" zingers to a mythmaker invoking the restrained passion of the Bronte sisters and the puritanical inhibitions of Nathaniel Hawthorne.
*cough* *cough* *cough*
Sorry, I was just having trouble swallowing all that. Twilight terror? The Village is going to go down as MNS's least frightening movie to date. What's really terrifying is how often he has to resort to cheap surprise scares to wake his audience up.
As for the whole repressed carnality thing, they must be referring to that fact that William Hurt's character won't hold hands with Sigourney Weaver's character. This could somehow represent the denial of lustful urges, I supose, but that's it. The characters don't spend the film leering at each other from afar, turning at the last minute to hide their hooded eyes. They hold hands, and occasionally dance. Someone rinse me off.
The Bronte/Hawthorne comparisons are flat out hilarious (and it probably doesn't help that I hated Wuthering Heights), but as a horror geek, I'm more offended by the Serling reference.
"The Village" is Shyamalan's best film yet, demanding repeated viewings and endless discussion about the morality and implications of the characters' choices.
One viewing was more than enough, thanks. The glacial pace, lack of legitimate scares, and ham-handed attempts at allegory will sink The Village, no matter how many movie reviewers remain unaware that Shyamalan has used up all the tricks up his sleeve.
[1] The linked review contains spoilers, so read at your own risk.
'Cause at this rate, the government will be asking for it back soon:
WASHINGTON - The White House projected Friday that this year's deficit will hit a record $445 billion, further fueling a campaign-season dispute over President Bush's handling of the economy.
The figure easily surpassed last year's $375 billion, making it the largest-ever in dollar terms. That gave ammunition to Democrats who say Bush's tax cuts and failure to prevent a loss of jobs during his term have worsened the outlook for the budget and the economy.
But in a political plus for Republicans, the new projection was also an improvement over forecasters' expectations of earlier this year. In February, the administration projected a $521 billion shortfall for 2004, while the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated a month earlier that the deficit would be $477 billion.
That's some good glass is half empty/half full back and forth going on there. I'm glad to see the deficit lowballed both the administration and the CBO, though when you start talking Sagan-style about hundreds of bee-lions of dollars, what's thirty more here or there? By my way of thinking, going more than, oh, $250B into the red isn't exactly healthy. Good thing the federal government doesn't have to abide by Sarbanes-Oxley.
Seeing as both sides will make hay out of this, I thought I'd focus on a few comments that struck me funny:
"We are meeting our national priorities and by showing spending restraint elsewhere in the budget we are on track to meet the president's commitment to cutting deficits in half" over the next five years, White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters aboard Air Force One as Bush flew to campaign stops in the Midwest.
I like how he failed to add, "Deficits that the president himself is responsible for helping create."
"Anyway you slice it, a deficit exceeding $400 billion this year alone is bad news for the country," said Thomas Kahn, Democratic staff director for the House Budget Committee. "Republicans' failed budget policies have converted record surpluses into the biggest deficits in American history."
And here the Dems will try to flank Bush's focus on terrorism, while the administration will continue to insist that everything will even out, provided you leave them in power. Otherwise, they can't be held responsible.
Normally, I'm reluctant to completely attribute the health of the economy (or the stock market, for that matter) to the current puppet in the White House. I don't believe Bush the Elder deserved all the rap for the economic downturn of the early '90s, just as Clinton's policies weren't the alpha and omega of the mid-'90s boom. Deficits, however, are something else, and all the comments about how we've gone from record surpluses to record debts in less than four years are pretty on target.
Then again, maybe something else is at play here:
Republicans have blamed the invasion of Iraq and recession for the fiscal problems.
In other words, the administration is trying to avoid being held accountable for the massive deficit by, in part, blaming it on something for which it can be held accountable. Interesting tactic.
How many times have we heard "He was such a quiet man" from the neighbors of people arrested for murder? "Seemed like a nice guy," "Kept to himself," and on and on. The phrases get boring the third or fourth time you hear them, but they never go away. Clichéd as they may be, they accurately reflect the astonishment most of us would feel if we discovered someone living in close proximity was a murderer.
So you can imagine my horror at finding out one of these fiends is living in my very own house.
I got in late last night after a screening of The Village and needed to go to my office to write my review for Film Threat (of course, they ended up running someone else's[1] after I stayed up 'til 1:00 writing mine...not that I'm bitter or anything). In short, there was no time to waste, and I didn't linger in the unlit front room. No, it wasn't until this morning that I discovered the carnage.
The scene played like something out of our darkest nightmares, with bodies strewn across the floor and wreckage everywhere. I approached the fallen, seeking to offer aid or - at the very least - comfort, but there was nothing to be done. Whoever did this had been mercilessly thorough. Not knowing what else to do, I sought to document the incident, in order to prevent further bloodshed.

I don't think Pooh had a chance. Here we see how he was cut down just before he could reach the safety of the entertainment center. Personally, I suspect the killer toyed with Pooh, allowing him to believe he might make it to shelter, before he/she brutally snuffed him out.

This is, to me, the most heartbreaking. In my mind, the killer tortured Eeyore from afar, pelting him with blocks (visible in the first picture) from afar, until Tigger had no choice but to come to his friend's aid. Then, the killer took them both.
I don't know who that is in the left foreground. Doubtless some innocent bystander who ran afoul of the culprit.

Of course, it's always the children who suffer the most in these situations. From his expression, it appears this poor unfortunate looked our killer in the eyes before he died.
I'm working on a list of suspects, and I think I've got it narrowed down to two: there's Owl, who's always so high-strung and tweaked out, and there's Christopher Robin. Sure, he "seems like a nice boy," but never trust a person who wears short pants year-round.
That puts Charlie Brown and Bart Simpson on my primary suspect list as well.
[1] Oh, the things I could tell you about Chad Bixby
Visitors are flocking to area shores, in spite of the presence of sharks and other nasties:
Shark attacks and bacterial infections had no noticeable effect on the number of visitors drawn to area beaches Wednesday, say several people who work on the coast.
"People are swimming," said Peter Davis, assistant director of the Galveston Beach Patrol.
Two people were bitten by sharks this week, one Sunday off Bryan Beach in Brazoria County and one Tuesday along Galveston's seawall. And a species of the vibrio bacteria has killed three people in Texas this year and sickened 20, including a Houston man who lost both legs to the infection and was in critical condition Wednesday at a Victoria hospital.
These last two attacks have been lead news stories for a week. Never mind that the kid on Bryan Beach was committing the 1st degree no-nos of surf fishing with his catch in hand and his bait attached to his belt, or that the girl bitten off Galveston was apparently the victim of a standard "bite and release." Not that this is consolation to either of them after having to endure surgery for their wounds, but more people died in car accidents in Houston last night than died of shark attacks off Texas coasts all last year.
Ah, who am I kidding? I've been afraid of sharks since I was 6 years old. They used to have those great tabloid magazines in the 1970's with blow-by-blow descriptions of horrible (and most likely fictitious) shark attacks, accompanied by artists' renderings of the grisly scenes. Typical masochist, I'd read the things cover to cover in my local 7-11 and suffer nightmares for weeks, which would usually fade from memory just in time for the next issue to come out.
Even so, I'd be more worried about that bacteria:
Texas Department of Health records show that about 35 people are infected by vibrio vulnificus each year. Last year, there were 43 cases and seven deaths.
TDH epidemiologist Linda Gaul said people with open cuts should avoid exposure to the gulf, bay and other coastal waters. She said wounds or cuts that are exposed to the water should be washed immediately with soap and fresh water.
Symptoms of vibrio vulnificus infection include redness and swelling, ulcers, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. If vibrio infects the bloodstream, which is more likely to happen for those with diabetes, weakened immune systems or liver problems, there could be fever, chills, septic shock and blistering skin lesions.
It took a while for reports of the man who lost both his legs to the bacteria to make the news, probably because all the networks were breathlessly reporting the 1st case of West Nile virus in the area last week. West Nile affected a whopping 48 people in Harris County last year, killing 3 (which is about a normal week's worth of homicides in Houston), yet it still manages to snag hysterical news coverage throughout the summer months.
If we ever get another case of encephalitus around here I think our TVs will explode.
As for the recent shark attacks...you know, it is Shark Week on the Discovery Channel again. Don't be surprised if Wayne Dolcefino presents some grainy news footage this week of a Discovery Comunications yacht dumping chum near Bayou Vista.
Warner Brothers is punching the reset button on the Batman and Superman franchises. Superman, as we all know, has been plagued with script problems, directorial changes, and endless casting rumors. They appear to have settled on Bryan Singer to direct, which is a step in the right direction, but there's a long way to go yet.
For the new Batman film, on the other hand, WB nabbed Christopher Nolan early on and assembled a frankly impressive (if overwhelmingly British) cast for him to work with, including Michael Caine, Cilliam Murphy, Liam Neeson, Gary Oldman, and Tom Wilkinson. Bats himself will be played by Christian Bale, who's been nails in just about everything I've seen him do (yeah, even Reign of Fire). Against my will, I've been getting pretty excited about the new film.
Of course, I allowed myself to get excited about the 1989 Batman movie too, which didn't go over very well. For such a major studio effort, it played as very low budget. Maybe it was the Prince songs, or Robert Wuhl, or that the entire movie was shot in a soundstage. Michael Keaton didn't bother me, except for the fact that his Batman was always fleeing from the bad guys. After a while, I wondered if they'd mistakenly threaded Logan's Run into the projector.
Obviously, the later films aren't worth mentioning. Except in bitter, bitter tones.
Today I saw that the Batman Begins teaser is online. Follow the link, click "Trailer" and enter your player settings. It's very Batman: Year One, showing Bruce Wayne's travels in the wake of his parents' deaths. It's also a teaser in every sense of the word, as there's about a millisecond of Bale in the Batman cowl. Still, it's done it's job, and now I'm stuck waiting until next summer for it to come out.
Tom DeLay is either clumsily attempting to deflect growing criticism of his fundraising activities, or he's as big an idiot as we've often suspected:
A super-sized Statue of Liberty, holding aloft an order of french fries, is adorning food tray liners in Subway restaurants across Germany. And House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, is angry enough about it to lose his lunch.
"This is every bad stereotype about corporate America come true," DeLay said in a news release.
The ad in German, whose headline translates as "Why are Americans so fat?" is a promotional tie-in to the movie Super Size Me, director Morgan Spurlock's take on life in the fast-food lane.
...
Subway officials point out that the prime images on the tray liners — the goateed, fry-stuffing madman and the Rubenesque Lady Liberty — were both borrowed directly from the movie promotions running in Germany.
DeLay is obviously unaware that it's essentially "anything goes" overseas when it comes to advertising. I've always liked the fact that otherwise serious American actors and artists can usually be coaxed into making a whiskey commercial in Japan, or selling noodles in Malaysia (many ads of this nature used to be availble to view on AdCritic, but it looks like you have to pay now).
Besides, I've been to Germany and let's just say it wouldn't surprise me if Subway was finding a sizable audience for lowfat alternatives over there as well.
I guess for some companies, corporate patriotism is as flexible as Jared's waistline," DeLay said.
DeLay objected to the ad's parody of the Statue of Liberty, "one of the most recognizable American symbols."
And he complained aboutthe flier including a quote from filmmaker and "pathological partisan" Michael Moore, whose anti-Bush diatribe Fahrenheit 9/11 has become the Democrats' choice for best picture.
Moore is quoted as saying, "The only time I have been scared for my life has been going through a McDonald's drive-through."
DeLay said, "For Subway to thumb its nose at its American customers and promote Michael Moore's blame-America-first conspiracy in a foreign country is very concerning."
His comments about recognizable American symbols are well taken. After all, he's been parodying a Congressman in another one of our most recognizable symbols - the Capitol - for years.
Morgan Spurlock struck a deal with Subway to use Super Size Me to promote Subway's healthier menu. In the process, they put a porky Lady Liberty on some placemats. I'm no big city political analyst, but certainly there are other things a U.S. Congressman could be worrying about besides bitching at a fast food company for engaging in the same sort of behavior fast food companies have been engaging in since the 1980s.
Like, say, explaining how money donated to your children's charity ended up paying for luxury suites and yacht cruises, for starters.
As for the placemat, I would've used a Blazing Saddles theme, and found some way to incorporate the line "Fourteen is my limit on schnitzengruben" in there somewhere.
This 7,328th installment of Unnecessary Remake News comes to you courtesy of the Hollywood Reporter:
Tony Bill's "My Bodyguard" is next up for the remake treatment. The re-do of the 1980 film, which starred Chris Makepeace, Adam Baldwin and Matt Dillon, is being set up at Dimension Films. Jeff Lieber is penning the script about a boy who enlists his new school's most feared kid when he finds himself being bullied.
Even though the concept of hiring a goon to challenge the school bully was briefly revisited in the equally noteworthy Three O'Clock High (and Richard Tyson was infinitely more intimidating that Chachi Matt Dillon), the concept's a little outdated. Post-Columbine, it seems hard to believe bullies would risk going after the twitchy, disaffected kids anymore.
Unless the bullies are better armed, that is.
As a twitchy, disaffected kid myself, I really liked My Bodyguard (even though I was pretty sure even I could've handled Screech Matt Dillon). I am against the idea of a remake, but that's hardly news, and won't keep Hollywood from doing what they like. I still have fond memories of the original, which is all that really matters.
Besides, who would've guessed quiet Ricky Linderman would grow up to be this friendly character?
Wouldn't be much of a cromulent blog if I didn't comment on this:
A Simpsons toon is coming out of the closet. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Speaking during a weekend panel at San Diego's Comic-Con convention, show producers dropped a bomb: An upcoming Simpsons story line will focus on what happens when Springfield legalizes gay marriage.
"We have a show where, to raise money, Springfield legalizes gay marriage," producer Al Jean told comic book fans. "Homer becomes a minister by going on the Internet and filling out a form. A longtime character comes out of the closet, but I'm not saying who."
And with that, Simpsons aficionados got their gaydar on and began winnowing down the list of potential suspects.
The early favorite appears to be billionaire Monty Burns' ever-devoted sidekick, Waylon Smithers, who--aside from being a yes-man--has been known to collect Malibu Stacy dolls, lives in the gay part of town (where Homer once shacked up with two gay guys), has a Mr. Burns screensaver and dreams of a naked Mr. Burns jumping out of a birthday cake.
But that might be too easy. According to online fan scuttlebutt, there are other characters who might be secretly having a gay old time in Springfield, including Homer's regular-guy cohorts at the nuclear plant, Carl and Lenny, as well as Moe the bartender, the Reverend Lovejoy, Principal Skinner and Comic Book Guy. Of course, the producers didn't rule out a lesbian wedding, either.
We'll cover those the article mentions first...
It's not Smithers. Smithers only has eyes for Mr. Burns who, as we know from his courting Marge's mom and Snake's ex Gloria (Julia Louis-Dreyfus), seems to have an eye for the ladies. Besides, it's much too obvious. Odds: 15 to 1
Carl and Lenny? Lenny's the one with the serious man-love for Carl, and while I don't know how much of that is shared by the Mr. Carlson, he did fly in on a helicopter to save him from a burning oil well. I seriously doubt any of my hetero lifemates would do the same for me. Odds: 6 to 1
Moe has a long history of failed relationships, most of which never lasted more than the time it took for him to make his opening line (Collette the waitress in Season 3), though he did date Renee (Helen Hunt) until he ran out of money. Odds: 20 to 1
There's never been any hint that the long-married Reverend Lovejoy harbors homosexual tendencies. Doesn't mean he's off limits, but it's a long shot. Odds: 50 to 1
Seymour is repressed, but recently proposed to Mrs. Krabapple. Groening and company could use his military background to play on the whole "gays in the military" angle, but I kind of doubt it. And there is the whole mommy issue thing. Odds: 25 to 1
Finally, the Comic Book Guy may be a geek, but he's all about the females. He had a shared moment with a fellow (double-X chromosome) geek over a water-damaged stack of Little Lulus, downloads naked Captain Janeway porn, and was almost seduced by Lucy Lawless. And who can forget the horrible spectacle of seeing him in bed with Agnes Skinner? Odds: 75 to 1
UPDATE: Oh, and I don't think it's Ned Flanders, as some of you in the comments are suggesting. The last big Simpsons "event" was Maude's death, which would make the potential outing of Ned a pretty boring proposition. Could he be repressing his true feelings due to years of piety and spanking therapy? Perhaps, but he also nailed Hollywood starlet Sara Sloane (Marisa Tomei) in Season 14. Hardly the act of a man about to switch teams.
Anyway, click below for more worthless speculation.
Both Patty and Selma have their intimacy issues, and both have the hots for MacGyver. Patty doesn't like to be touched, but did date Principal Skinner for a time. Selma has been married to Lionel Hutz, Troy McClure, and Sideshow Bob, which would seem to make her a serial heterosexual monogamist. There are several references to Patty having been either born a man or presently being a man, however, and both were shown on the "Still in the Closet" float a couple seasons back. Patty's definitely a strong contender. Odds: 5 to 1
Who else? Captain McAllister has alluded to resorting to homosexuality at sea, though he did participate in the Springfield Bachelor Auction (as did Hans Moleman). Plus, he married a man to a cow in international waters (thereby proving Rick Santorum's theory on homosexual marriage leading to bestiality?). Odds: 10 to 1
Ms. Hoover? Unmarried, but dated Apu. Could be perfect for Patty, however. Odds: 15 to 1
Otto? Metal dudes are never gay. Just ask Rob Halford. Plus he's married. Odds: 25 to 1
Groundskeeper Willy? Unlikely, I seem to recall an episode where he made out with an equally unattractive Scottish female. And he dated Sherry Bobbins. Odds: 30 to 1
I think we can probably rule out most of the school kids, though Martin is notoriously fey. And the Love-O-Matic did say Kearney was gay.
Barney's been on several failed dates, but (and you'll pardon the stereotyping) he's probably too slovenly to be gay. Odds: 35 to 1
It won't be Apu, who went through an oat sowing phase before settling down and having septuplets with Manjula. Odds: 75 to 1
Chief Wiggum: married. Further, it probably wouldn't be very funny. Odds: 50 to 1
Mayor Quimby: Oh please. Odds: 100 to 1
Krusty the Clown? Interesting. He fathered a child during the Gulf War, but has never really been attached to any other woman romantically (though there was the "Look at those magumbos" comment). And he seems to share a special bond with Sideshow Mel. He's my dark horse. Odds: 12 to 1
Channel 6 anchor Kent Brockman has a daughter and was, at one point, married. Doesn't mean a lot, however. Odds: 25 to 1
Bumblebee Man is married and seems like a normal straight guy. Who happens to constantly wear a bee costume. Odds: 75 to 1
Dr. Nick has been AWOL for the better part of the last few seasons. That alone is reason enough to remove him from consideration. Odds: 35 to 1
Professor Frink has hooked up with a female assistant and a cocktail waitress after Mesmerino turned him into a makeout artist. Odds: 40 to 1
Sideshow Bob is another one of those "never been seen with a woman" types (his homicidal marriage to Selma doesn't count), but he's not enough of a regular character to make him a worthwhile choice. Odds: 35 to 1
I suppose it could be Fat Tony, but that's a stretch. He isn't on the show much, and the idea kind of runs counter to the manly mobster stereotype. Odds: 50 to 1
This whole time-waster of an exercise assumes, of course, that anything resembling normal continuity is followed. Besides, aren't Kang and Kodos already married? Does that count?
Since I have a sneaking suspicion it's going to be something fairly obvious (Lenny and Carl are worrying me), I'll go with an essentially left field prediction: DuffMan - who I feel certain is hiding his true feelings behing that party hardy attitude, and Handsome Pete, who dances for nickels. Or maybe Poochie.
And there's always Homer's cousin Frank, who later became cousin Francene and is now Mother Shabooboo.
Who'd I leave out?
Jack Sparks likes the new Old 97s album:
Thank God for Drag It Up. Now we're talkin'. This record has all the bravado of Wreck Your Life, with just a dash of age and maturity, that seems more of a natural progression from where these guys started. It's hard to put your finger on it, but that guitar sound is back. It's kind of biscuit mixed and gasoline fed, and it sounds crude next to Rhett's aching heart throb of a voice, but THAT'S the core of what they do. Just plug this into your car's outputs and get on the damn road. Murray's "In the Satellite Rides a Star," and Rhett's "Adelaide" will absolutely break your heart, and the opening track "Won't Be Home" is the kind of Friday night, rip the tops off the six pack, and get her rollin' anthem that this summer needed.
Good news. I also hated Satellite Rides, and after the band went on hiatus several years ago I more or less assumed Rhett would enjoy moderate mainstream popularity - by making music I'd never bother to listen to - and the rest of the guys would go on about their lives. Maybe I'll be able to retract some of my previous statements once and for all.
This week, Texas Tuesdays takes a look at Kelly White, former executive director of Austin's SafePlace - a nonprofit set up to help victims of rape and domestic abuse - who is running against Republican Todd Baxter in HD 48. The site has more information on the race as well as a Q&A with White. Go check it out.
Lost amidst all the convention hooplah, riveting pre-Olympics coverage, and the unveiling of Episode III's title (they didn't go with my suggestion[1]) comes news of the long-awaited release of Showgirls on DVD. And what a DVD it is:
LOS ANGELES - It was "42nd Street" with pasties, "All About Eve" with a G-string. Only those movies were cinema classics, while "Showgirls" was so bad that adjectives such as awful, wretched and appalling somehow seemed too kind. But if a film festers in video stores long enough, its audience eventually will sniff it out.
Since it imploded critically and commercially in 1995, "Showgirls" has gained such a fringe following of movie masochists that distributor MGM is releasing a "V.I.P. Edition" DVD set on Tuesday, playing up the film's campy atrociousness.
The elaborate package includes shot glasses and playing cards for "Showgirls" drinking games; glossy pictures of star Elizabeth Berkley (news); plus pasties, a blindfold and a poster of Berkley for a "pin-the-pasties-on-the-showgirl" game.
Among DVD extras are a tutorial on how to give a lap dance and audio commentary titled "The Greatest Movie Ever Made."
Targeting those pathetically post-ironic wannabe hipsters, eh? Sign me up.
I can't remember when I saw Showgirls. It wasn't in the theater, since I was in grad school in '95 and made it to about two movies a year (and those at the dollar cinema three blocks away that played Bollywood productions Wed-Sun and had no heat or air conditioning). As is usually the case with dramatically lowered expectations, I'd been exposed to so many scathing critiques by the time I sat down to watch it there was no way it could be as bad as everyone said it was, and it wasn't.
Oh, don't get me wrong, it's bad. But there should be enough distractions within, including the hilarious dialogue, a perpetually topless Gina Gershon, and the premise that Elizabeth Berkley has "more natural talent" than one character has ever seen. Its badness is tempered by the fact that those involved must have possessed a certain awareness of all the over-the-top breast-baring and catfighting. Attempting to take the proceedings seriously would've earned Paul Verhoeven those seven Razzies. As it is, I'd still rate it higher than Pearl Harbor.
Though with lines like, "She's no butterfly, Tony, she's all pelvic thrust," it's amazing screenwriter Joe Eszterhas hasn't had to turn in his WGA card. He belatedly tried to pass this one off, as he did with Basic Instinct, as a tale of female empowerment, which might come off as pretentious if Eszterhas had any idea what the word "empowerment" meant.
For critics, "Showgirls" was like shooting fish in a barrel with a Gatling gun. Berkley took the worst of it for her garish masquerade as a stripper turned Vegas showgirl, but the movie also was a career low for co-stars Kyle MacLachlan and Gina Gershon. The actors declined interviews for this story.
...
"That one is so surreal you just can't believe you're watching it," said [writer David] Schmader, who estimates he has seen "Showgirls" 100 times. "It seems like this great lost Pinter scene where subtext is everything, until you realize that there absolutely is no subtext. They're just talking about eating dog food."
Speaking of pretentious, who drops Pinter references in a Showgirls article?
[1] We Got Your Money - inspired by classic Austin punk outfit the Big Boys
Much as I enjoy ferreting out the comments inviting me to wager online and view hot man-on-dog action, and as gratifying as it is that 14-year old girls continue to hurl their bodies into the path of largely nonexistent barbs aimed at their precious Legolas in my Orlando Bloom entry of some nine months ago, enough is enough. Michael and Ginger installed MT Close Comments earlier this month, and I've just gotten around to adding it to my template. If I did it right, comments will be closed on all entries at least 45 days old and inactive for 3 days. What this means, ultimately, is you've missed your chance to chime in on my adventures playing Knights of the Old Republic.
But I think the sequel comes out this year.
Len points out a tactic that might be as effective against exasperating husbands as it is against disobedient teens: selling their video game console on eBay:
UP FOR AUCTION OR FOR SALE DUE TO PUNISHMENT
PLAY STATION 2
PS2
USED
PLAYS GREAT! ASK MY SON
Remind me to get that laundry put away when I get home.
As alluded to here in the past, I am a proud veteran of the food and drink service industry. I worked in fast food for my first couple jobs, spent a year in high school delivering pizzas, some five years during post-undergrad and graduate school as a waiter, and mixed in some bartending during that time as well. Everyone who's spent time in that field has horror stories and variants on the "customer from hell," as well as tales of vengeance that would make the blood of the restaurant-going population run cold.
For those who want to read such stories at a safe distance, as well as hear of customers who were actually appreciative of their service, the internet has what you need. A few of the web sites I've been enjoying include:
BitterWaitress.com - Tipping styles of the rich and famous, industry stories, and the Shitty Tipper Database, where "revenge is a dish best served in a black pleather Amex folder."
The Stained Apron - The name says it all, really. Some nice revenge stories.
BarSpooge.com - Fun bartender stories. A little sparse in content, but some hairy stuff, nonetheless.
Of course, it's not just the dining industry that is publishing dirt on unpleasant customers. There are also pages out there for indignant yard sale hosts, irritated tech support reps, and one near to my heart, the pizza delivery guy.
I think there are some sites dedicated to reviews of "escort services" as well, but this site is already blocked by enough web filters.
The last stage of the Tour de France is always so anticlimactic, but the ABC coverage of Lance Armstrong's 6th Tour win was nice for those of us who don't get the freaking Outdoor Life Network. I also liked the recap of the previous 5-time winners, and while I knew Eddy Merckx was knocked out of contention for a 6th Tour win by a drunken Frenchman, I didn't know the nature of the attack. I'm assuming a "liver punch" is similar in spirit to a "kidney punch," but I always thought it'd be kind of hard to actually hit the liver.
Must be one of those shaolin things. Or, considering the source, one of those savate things.
At any rate, you can all rest easy that I'm done talking about cycling for another year. Oh, and I flew my Texas flag today to commemorate the event. The flag was obtained - in honor of our noble Texas ancestors - by stealing it from a Mexican family who lived down the street from us in our old neighborhood.[1]
[1] Actually, it was stolen from an affluent white couple, which probably makes it okay.
Ex-Heisman Trophy winner, UT Longhorn/New Orleans Saint/Miami Dolphin Ricky Williams unexpectedly retired today at the age of 27 to, uh, travel:
MIAMI (AP) -- The first sign of a change in Ricky Williams came when he returned from vacation in Australia last winter with a shaved head, the distinctive dreadlocks gone.
Now he's gone, too. Williams has decided to retire at the peak of his career, stunning the Miami Dolphins and leaving an enormous void in their backfield less than a week before the start of training camp.
Williams, who rushed for 3,225 yards in two seasons with the Dolphins, phoned from Hawaii to inform coach Dave Wannstedt of his decision, then continued his travels by flying to Tokyo.
Williams had just started to shine at Miami, so his early retirement is a bit of a surprise, especially to the Dolphins, who are now stuck with Travis Minor as their sole RB.
With three years left on his contract that had a hefty signing bonus, he may end up owing his old team some money. As for his future plans:
Officials at Texas anticipate that Williams will return to Austin to earn his degree in education and pursue work with children.
Selfish bastard. Though that should probably read, "Officials at Texas hope hope hope Heisman winner Williams will return to Austin to distract Longhorn fans from Mack Brown's failure to contend for a national championship."
I would like to preface this entry by saying that I understand children's programming is not aimed at me. I've gotten into plenty of arguments with people over the relative merits of Barney or the Teletubbies and usually hewed to the line of reasoning that it's not for us. Is Barney annoying to a 30-year old? Of course, just as Frontline with Bill Moyers is probably bewildering to a 2-year old. I can understand that constant exposure, caused by infinite repeat viewings of prerecorded children's programming, can lead to madness, but it's hardly becoming for an alleged adult to support "Kill Barney" movements or the like.
Having said that, who is this Elmo asshole?
I stopped watching Sesame Street before the little red bastard ever showed up, so my confusion began with the Tickle-Me Elmo phenomenon of several years ago. Of course, I knew various Muppets came and went through the years (where are you, Guy Smiley?), and didn't think much of it at the time.
Our kid doesn't watch a lot of TV. We don't plop her down in front of it and she shows little interest in it when it is on. Except for Elmo. The Wife usually straps She Who Shall Not be Named into the low-rider swing for 10 or 15 minutes every morning so she can get ready for work, and turns Sesame Street on for her. There's apparently a segment of the show called "Elmo's World" that involves Grover's love-starved cousin conversing with his goldfish and answering viewer mail. Even upon hearing this, I didn't think much of it, until the first time I got the baby ready in the morning and realized "Elmo's World" lasts 20 freaking minutes.
It's an outrage, sez I. Where's Cookie Monster (not to be seen this morning)? Why has Grover's role been so severely truncated? And only one sketch featuring the smoldering homoerotic undercurrents of the relationship between Big Bird and Snuffleuphagus?
You thought I was going to say Bert and Ernie, didn't you? Please, there's no "undercurrent" in that relationship.
Nothing like playing your heavy hitters more often in the lineup, but one-third of the show? I had no idea Elmo was such a phenomenon. Kids usually move from trend to trend faster than you can say, "secret of the ooze," but Elmo appears to have some serious staying power.
And I'm avoiding the obvious joke, for once.
To go along with Salon's interview with Alan Moore (thanks to the Howling Curmudgeons for the tip), The Hollywood Reporter breaks the news that Moore's superlative Watchmen is coming to the big screen (via Dark Horizons):
"Watchmen," the seminal DC Comics limited series, has landed at Paramount Pictures. Darren Aronofsky will develop and direct the project, which is being written by David Hayter. Aronofsky's producing partner Eric Watson will produce with Larry Gordon and Lloyd Levin. "Watchmen," created by writer Alan Moore and artist Dave Gibbons, was released as a 12-issue comic book in 1986 and is one of the most critically acclaimed series in the genre. The comic is credited for redefining the superhero genre and is often referred to as the "War and Peace" of comic books. It is a crime-conspiracy story that provided the first realistic look at the behind-the-heroics lives of superhero archetypes.
Standard concerns apply: respect for the source material - which has been a problem with Moore adaptations (e.g. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen); time constraints (I can easily see the Black Freighter panels and a significant portion of the flashbacks cut), and casting, which I don't even want to think about at this point (Matthew Lillard as Nite Owl!).
Aronofsky was attached to the new Batman film for a while, and is slated to head up the film version of Kazuo Koike's Lone Wolf and Cub, while Hayter wrote X-Men, X2, and the upcoming Iron Man adaptation, so I'm not too worried about those guys.
No, my concerns stem from the historical treatment of Alan Moore's work. He's more or less completely hands-off when it comes to filming his comics, which is his prerogative, but it would be a shame for Watchmen to get the League treatment (Seth Green as Rorschach!).
And I'm still waiting for my V for Vendetta miniseries on the BBC.
My recommendation this weekend is for all of you to check out Catwoman. No, not the movie itself...the reviews. Specifically, see how many reviewers have used the delicious pun "cat-astrophe" to describe it in their write-ups. A cursory look at the Metacritic page for the film revealed two, as well as two references to "hairballs."
What a bunch of jerks movie reviewers are.
Anyway, my latest review, for The Bourne Supremacy, is up at Film Threat: Decent action, an excellent car chase, and Franka Potente. It's all - as the hipsters say - good.
My review for Colin Farrell's latest, A Home at the End of the World, should be up tomorrow.
"Je suis roi du monde!"

First Armstrong wins yesterday's stage, the only rider to finish in under 40 minutes, then he wins Stage 17 to extend his lead over Ivan Basso to 4:09. At this rate, he could stop off during Stage 19 and have a beer with some spectators and still win.
Seven, anyone?
Irritating the government is one thing, but when Michael Moore starts pissing off America's sinister cabal of game show hosts, watch out (via Fark):
DALLAS (Wireless Flash) -- Michael Moore should hope he never meets up with game show host Bob Eubanks in a public bathroom.
"The Newlywed Game" host has had a feud with the "Fahrenheit 9/11" director ever since Moore's 1989 documentary "Roger and Me" showed him telling an off-color joke: "Why do Jewish women never get AIDS? They only marry a**holes, they don't screw `em."
Eubanks claims that he only told the joke because he thought the camera was off, and insists the joke was told to him by a Jewish friend.
"Some of my best friends are Jews," Eubanks added, "And I love Jewish entertainers like Barbra Streisand and Bruce Springstein."
While he thought the joke was innocuous, the furor over it cost him a job at CBS and forced him to apologize on "Entertainment Tonight."
Eubanks is reportedly planning to join James Watt, Al Campanis, Marge Schott, and the ghost of Jimmy the Greek on the newly created Cultural Diversity Panel at Bob Jones University.
Blockbuster Video is preparing to release the hounds on Netflix:
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) -- Blockbuster Inc. chairman and CEO John Antioco promised shareholders Tuesday that the video rental giant will take the fight to online rental rival Netflix Inc. when it launches its own Internet-based rental service this year.
While Blockbuster executives have in the past often shrugged off the competitive threat from Netflix and the significance of the online rental market in general, Antioco openly acknowledged its strategic importance at his company's annual shareholder meeting.
"Two million (customers) have spoken," he said, referring to Netflix's subscriber base. "We can't continue to allow our customers to erode away from us. We are not going to ignore these folks."
Why not? Your company as good as ignored its customers for years by giving lousy service, poor selection, and charging usurious late fees. We use Netflix, since our only non-BB option for renting movies is several miles away, and I don't care if Blockbuster offers a free six-pack per rental, I'm not going back.
Well...depends on the six-pack.
Asked whether Blockbuster's $24.95 a month in-store subscription pass compares well with Netflix's slightly cheaper online offer, Antioco said it is "a hell of a better deal," because his company offers unlimited numbers of rentals under the pass. While Netflix users rent seven to eight DVDs a month, Blockbuster's Movie Pass owners rent more than 10 a month.
The standard Netflix deal ($21.99 a month) stipulates you can have 3 DVDs out at any given time, and can otherwise replace them as often as you like. Meaning your rentals per month are only limited by how often you send the DVDs back. Personally, I have a little difficulty making my way through more than 2 movies a night (less if it's a TV show DVD, which often has four episodes), but I'm sure there are childless people who enjoy several movies a day. Even so, Antioco seems to think renters are incapable of keeping a constantly rotating selection going, which is how most Netflix user go about it.
Of course, he might be referring to the fact that - according to the article - Blockbuster won't be able to duplicate Netflix's overnight deliveries right away, so their subscribers might, y'know, need to stockpile.
Unless Blockbuster is planning on vastly improving its rental catalogue beyond the dismal selection available at most stores and/or giving its renters the option of getting uncut movie releases,I doubt they're getting any old customers back.
[Does that cool razor-edged compact disc count as WMD?]

I forget, which candidate is the one who flip-flops again?
With polls showing public support for the war in Iraq in decline, the Republican president cast himself as a reluctant warrior as he campaigned in the battleground state of Iowa against Democrat John Kerry and his running mate, former trial lawyer John Edwards. Bush lost the state in 2000 by only a few thousand votes.
"The enemy declared war on us," he told a re-election rally. "Nobody wants to be the war president. I want to be the peace president."
Bush has called himself a "war president" in leading the United States in a battle against terrorism brought about by the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on America.
"I'm a war president. I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with war on my mind," he said in February.
Bush could always try running the "peace" thing up the flagpole and seeing who gives him money salutes, but I think it's a mistake. Changing directions three months before the election probably isn't the best strategy, given his base of support.
The good news is, progress on Project Arcturus appears to be well ahead of schedule:
"For a while we were marching to war. Now we're marching to peace. ... America is a safer place. Four more years and America will be safe and the world will be more peaceful," Bush said.
Bush continued, "For in 2008 we will have completed construction of the Quantum Dome, which will be impervious to all forms of attack. The only drawback is you must stay within the confines of its mystical force field...forever! Moo hoo ha ha ha ha!" The President then wrapped his cape around himself and disappeared in a cloud of green smoke.
Anyway, I wish I was surprised by this tactic:
Bush and Cheney have sought to cast Kerry and Edwards as on the side of trial lawyers, who the president believes are responsible for a flood of personal injury litigation that burdens the courts and is costly to small business. Democrats get campaign contributions from trial lawyers, while many businesses tend to favor the Republicans.
"I'm not a lawyer, you'll be happy to hear," Bush said to cheers. "That's the other team. This is the pro-small business team."
Bush's early 20s must be hazier than we thought if he doesn't even remember applying to law school.
"I am sure there is a place for young George Bush somewhere. However, in light of his grades on the LSAT exams, that place is not the School of Law at the University of Texas." - Dean Page Keeton, University of Texas Law School
And Bush is obviously operating from some definition of "small business" of which I was not previously aware.
In the latest news from the celebrity voting front, it would seem that not all of those Hollywood types are rabid political animals:
Shamefaced Matt Damon has confessed he has never voted, even though best pal Ben Affleck is a leading celebrity Democrat. While Affleck makes plans to hit the campaign trail with Democrat presidential hopeful John Kerry, Damon reveals he always felt his vote meant nothing. The actor says, "My reasoning has always been - and this is the worst thing to say - that because I'm from Massachusetts, everyone I would have ever voted for didn't need my vote. That's changing now because of where we're going in this country (America)." Damon insists he'll be the among the first Bostonians registering to vote in November.
Where, once again, his vote won't matter. Someone from The Smoking Gun must've been sniffing around.
I've had this discussion with acquaintances of mine, pointing out that - while their vote in the Presidential election may not have that big an impact - there are always state and local elections that have some impact on their lives.[1] Damon's a Harvard boy, though, and presumably they teach such things in the Ivy League.
At least Damon is properly chagrined by his laziness, and plans to vote his conscience. Unlike, say Jessica Alba:
"...I just don't have a great feeling about what we're doing in Iraq. I don't know why we're there. Didn't we just give the power back over there? Why are we still there?" Even though Alba disapproves of US President George W. Bush's actions, she is still unsure of whether to vote against him in the upcoming November presidential elections. She adds, "I don't want to upset my family. My family believes the opposite of what I believe. They're all Republicans."
Here's an idea: mix in a newspaper with your Us Weekly once in a while.
The "My family votes X, so I must as well" went out of fashion about 40 years ago, however. I don't think I'd have a big problem telling Mom and Dad to cram it after buying them a new house, but all families are different, I suppose.
[1]That I actually have to tell adults such a thing is another issue entirely.
How long can the Albert Pujols and the Cards keep up the pace?
CHICAGO -- Albert Pujols' third homer on a testy Tuesday at Wrigley Field brought the St. Louis Cardinals all the way back and sent the Chicago Cubs to a crushing defeat.
"It was the first time I've hit three home runs and it came at the right time," Pujols said after his shot in the ninth helped the Cardinals to an 11-8 comeback victory.
"It's one of those days you never forget."
Pujols went 5-for-5 with a double and five RBIs, helping St. Louis rally from a six-run deficit in the final meeting of the season between the heated rivals. The Cardinals left town with a 10-game lead over the third-place Cubs in the NL Central.
...
Pujols had an RBI double in the first, hit his 25th homer in the third, No. 26 in the seventh off Kyle Farnsworth and then his 27th in the ninth. It was his first three-homer game.
Nice to see the exclamation point put on the last series of the year with the Cubs after last night's bush league crap by Zambrano. It's just a shame the two teams don't meet anymore this season. Cubs-Cards is right up there with Yankees-Red Sox for one of the best rivalries in baseball, in my opinion.
VILLARD-DE-LANS, France -- Lance Armstrong retook the overall lead in the Tour de France on Tuesday, outsprinting his top two challengers to win the first stage in the Alps and close in on a record sixth straight title.
Armstrong moved past Ivan Basso and 1997 Tour champion Jan Ullrich in the curves before the closing stretch to claim his second stage victory in the 2004 Tour and the 18th of his illustrious career. He also has won two team time trials.
...
[Thomas Vieckler] held on until Tuesday, having bravely and narrowly defended his advantage in the Pyrenees. Armstrong entered those mountains trailing by nine minutes and whittled that down to 22 seconds heading to the Alps.
I remember some sports types speculating that nine minutes might be too much to overcome, and I had doubts myself. That's what I get for thinking.
Ullrich is a non-factor at this point (off the lead by 6:54), and probably won't even have the dubious honor of coming in second for the 6th straight year. Around the third time it happened, you'd think the guy would've clued in to the benefits of year-round training. By the sound of it, that Basso kid has, but Armstrong isn't moving aside yet:
Five-time Tour runner-up Ullrich's bid to dethrone Armstrong was hurt in the Pyrenees, but Basso appeared to still have a shot after two weeks of punishing racing.
Neither Ullrich nor Basso, though, had the strength to stay with Armstrong at the end of Tuesday's 112-mile ride from Valreas to Villard-de-Lans, which included seven climbs, in heat topping 85 degrees.
He leads Basso by 1:25. Barring a crash or, I don't know...meteor collision or something, it looks like Armstrong's got it.
UPDATE: Thanks to Scott for pointing me at this great picture of an Armstrong supporter in France. In a Houston Texans jersey, no less.
What's all the whining about, you sissies?
SACRAMENTO, CALIF. - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is refusing to apologize for calling Democrats who oppose his tough state budget "girlie men," a label foes say is sexist and homophobic.
The action film star turned politician made the remark Saturday as he told a shopping-mall crowd that the Democrats didn't have "the guts" to turn down the threats of special interest groups such as unions and trial lawyers.
Oh, that.
So Governor Schwarzenegger uses the time-honored political tactic of quoting TV and questioning one's masculinity ("Where's the beef?") to go after his opponents. In the process, he uses a term that could certainly be construed as offensive by gays and men incapable of throwing a football. So how do the Democrats respond?
Democratic State Senator Sheila Kuehl called Schwarzenegger's remark "blatant homophobia," adding: "It uses an image that is associated with gay men in an insulting way, and it was supposed to be an insult."
Other political opponents said the remark illustrates what they call the governor's tendency to be a bully when things do not go his way.
A spokesperson for Schwarzenegger said he has no intention of apologizing.
Several California newspaper op-ed columns echoed Senator Kuehl's homophobia slam, thereby also missing the point. Of course he's not going to apologize: there hasn't been a scene of true repentance in any of his movies (his faux apology to his groping accusers doesn't count, either). And since the man is incapable of speaking off the cuff unless he can trot out another line of his own creaky dialogue, I wouldn't hold my breath. I mean, how many times has he used that stupid "Terminator" joke? 500? A thousand?
Schwarzenegger has made anti-gay comments his entire life, and the voters of the state put him in office anyway. Attacking him for homophobia now is like closing the door to Abercrombie & Fitch after the hairstylist has left, and going on about the Governor's comments only allows the focus of the budget debate to shift from salient questions of policy to letting TV news directors and radio DJs dust off their old "Hans and Franz" tapes. California Dems are dropping the ball.
Hark, I hear someone trotting out another old chestnut:
Yet the "girlie men" line has sparked criticism even from Schwarzenegger's fellow Republicans. "Of course it's not a good idea; liberals don't have a sense of humor," Republican State Senator Tom McClintock said in an interview.
Rather than point out that there hasn't been a funny conservative comedian since...well...ever, I'd just like to congratulate McClintock on being able to put on a happy face after a political career marked by overwhelming failure (unsuccessful bids for Congress in 1992 and state controller in 1994 and 2002 to go along with his defeat in the recall election of 2003).
Chin up, Tom.
I'm done with Six Feet Under.
My entry from about a month ago mentioned the show's recent problem of veering away from its comedic roots in order to plunge the characters into misery (Lisa's death, Claire's disastrous string of boyfriends/lovers, and David and Keith's unendingly on again-off again relationship, to name a few examples). This week's episode might have finally sent me away for good, however.
For starters, I understand the grieving Nate is going through a lot right now, but wouldn't the wise move - from an alleged black comedy standpoint - be to put that in the background for a little while instead of focusing on what a pathetic wretch the man's becoming? Throwing this red herring out there about the possibility of Lisa being alive is just further torture for the character,
I don't see much humor in Ruth's new marriage either, except that - Babe aside - James Cromwell's past acting roles are making it hard to believe the man is going to turn out to be anything less than a Grade A bastard. I mean, what do you have to do to your son to get him to mail his own shit to you? I think the worst I ever did to my old man was teabag his Stroh's.[1]
And as funny as I may find it, there's no way Rico inexplicably playing house with a stripper is going to end well. Finally, does anybody really belive Brenda's relationship with the bad guy from Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle[2] is going to last?
Truth be told, I probably would've continued to put up with that stuff. The few bright spots (read: laughs) this season have come from David's experiences as a bodyguard and Brenda's manipulative uber-bitch of a mother. But this latest episode may just have put me off for good. The final half hour was nothing more than the adventures of David and the guy he stupidly gave a lift to as his passenger: robs him; beats him; makes him smoke crack; beats him some more; then steals his van and leaves him in a Long Beach alley. Not only was the audience subjected to 30 minutes of pointless sadism (and David's incredible inability to escape, even after the time the shmuck got out of the van without him, or the other time David got the drop on him and made the guy lose his gun), but - if the previews are to be believed - we can look forward to episode upon excruciating episode of David's PTSD. Not a lot of laughs there, I predict.
Maybe this was Alan Poul's vision all along, gradually turning what was once a darkly amusing show into a weekly cavalcade of angst and physical or emotional brutality. If so, I wish him and his show luck. For now, I can finally get caught up on Arrested Development.
[1] Just kidding. Dad drank Bud.
[2] Maybe if it was Demi Moore.
The otherwise inoffensive Dave Matthews Band has a strange effect on the people of Hartford (via Fark):
(Hartford) - Eyewitness News has new information on the riot that broke out at the Dave Matthews concert in Hartford last night.
Police used tear gas and sting balls to break up a fight in the Jai Alai parking lot.
To paraphrase Robin Williams playing Adrian Cronauer, "I didn't know he had balls."
Onward.
Eyewitnesses say people were throwing bottles and rocks at each other.
Twenty-five people were arrested on charges of inciting a riot, assault and breach of peace.
...
The scene reminded everyone of another riot at the Meadows five years ago.People fought, threw objects and burned cars at that Dave Matthews concert.
Now that's concise reporting. As for the DMB out-Bizkiting Fred Durst and his ilk, I'd have to surmise that the otherwise mellow Matthews fans finally had enough of $6 bottles of water and $14 service charges for their tickets.
And I hear they were confiscating bota bags at the gate.
Even if the Sci Fi Network hadn't admitted to its fakery in putting together "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan," an alleged documentary about Shyamalan and his supposed supernatural connections, the unrealistic premise and poor performances would've given it away soon enough. How do I know this? Because The Wife and I sat through all three hours of the damn thing tonight with absolutely no knowledge of the network's admission, and pegged it as a fake from about 20 minutes in.
The network announced in December that the reclusive Shyamalan, maker of "The Sixth Sense" and "Signs," had agreed to participate in a documentary about his life to run in connection with this summer's release of his new movie, "The Village."
Sci Fi said last month, however, that Shyamalan had soured on the documentary when the questions got too personal. Documentarians Nathaniel Kahn and Callum Greene pressed on and made a three-hour film, "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan," without his cooperation, the network said.
The Associated Press wrote about the documentary last month, and other media also ran accounts. In an interview, Greene described how Shyamalan's "cooperation dried up." A network spokesman told the AP that Sci Fi was confident it had legal grounds to air the film and would probably never work with Shyamalan again.
In a news release, Sci Fi said Shyamalan had attempted to shut down production of the "disturbing expose."
It was all a lie, and there is no buried secret, [network president Bonnie] Hammer said Friday.
It's hard to say who comes off looking worse: Shyamalan himself - convincing enough as an annoyed artiste, the filmmakers - who are so ham-handed in their investigative techniques they torpedo any possibility of credibility, or celebs like Johnny Depp and Adrien Brody - going along with the gag and either playing it beautifully (Depp) or atrociously (Brody).
"Guerilla marketing," as the article calls it, only works when the effort is subtle enough to carry the whiff of legitimacy. "The Buried Secret" never had a chance, forcing every supposed startling fact down the audience's throat and stretching an already shopworn storyline out to fill three hours.
Weak writing, lousy acting, and a dull story...sounds like just about all of the Sci Fi Channel's original programming.
The guy at my local burrito join who looks like Suge Knight but I'm pretty sure is Not Suge Knight made my burrito today.
PVH: Could I get that cut in half?
NSK: I don't think so, man. It's pretty soggy.
PVH: Yeah, my wife doesn't like the rice, so that tends to happen.
NSK: ...
PVH: So, I guess that's a negative.
NSK: Not unless you've got anything else to cut.
PVH: Not on me, no.
I've rationalized my cowardice by realizing it was a pretty soggy burrito.
My all-new, not-so-different review of A Cinderella Story is online now at Film Threat.
Not much to add. I think I purged most of the vitriol in the review itself.
[However, unlike the caption contest, this one actually has a prize]
As sometimes happens in the film reviewing gig, I get scheduled for two screenings on the same night. Such is the case next week, when both The Bourne Supremacy and Catwoman are showing Tuesday evening.
Normally, I'm a sucker for bad films, and the prospect of watching Halle Berry non-act for 90 minutes while wielding a bullwhip and fighting on rooftops in stiletto heels would be too much to pass up. Thing is, I liked the first Bourne movie (and I'm still trying to convince Franka Potente that it's perfectly legal to marry two women in the States[1]). Point being, I'm going to The Bourne Supremacy, leaving me with a 2-person pass for Catwoman I can't use. I'm going to have to limit entry to Houston residents, unless you really, really want to travel here to see the film, then I guess we'll work something out.
It's Tuesday night, 7:30 PM, at the Edwards Grand Palace on Wesleyan near 59. First person to e-mail me at general_buck_vh@yahoo.com and answer the following question gets the pass:
Halle Berry is the only "official" Bond girl to win an Academy Award. Which "unofficial" Bond girl (not in one of the 20 recognized films) has also won an Oscar?
Winner will be announced at 3:00 PM CST. We can work out the details of handing off the pass later.
[1] Now I just have to convince The Wife.
UPDATE: We have a wiener...and it's Andy (HWRNMNBSOL). Whether you actually want to see the film or would rather just use the pass as especially glossy toilet paper is up to you.
The answer, by the way, is Kim Basinger. She played Domino Petachi in Never Say Never Again, which is not part of the Bond franchise. Basinger won Best Supporting Actress for L.A. Confidential.
Jason had an interesting answer, putting forth Deborah Kerr of Casino Royale, who won a lifetime achievement Oscar of some sort. If it came down to it, I'd rule that an actual performance win outranks special awards, but Andy was so much faster on the draw there wasn't much point.
Stay tuned for the next contest, where I'll be giving away Yu-Gi-Oh! passes.
Review for Will Smith's latest action-packed gonzo summer spectacular up at Film Threat. The (possibly) surprising news is, it doesn't suck. The (wholly) unsurprising news is, it has about as much to do with Asimov as "All My Circuits."
Oh, and my review for A Cinderella Story should be up later today or tomorrow. If you can't spare the time to read it, just go to your local Home Depot, find one of those big rip hammers, and strike yourself on the head until you lose consciousness. That's pretty much the gist of the film.
Fark has a link to someone's list of the 10 Dumbest Moments in Science Fiction Cinema:
10. Imperial walkers attack the rebels - The Empire Strikes Back
9. The aliens need "signs" - Signs
8. John Hurt feels better, so opts for breakfast - Alien
7. Skynet sends a new and improved Terminator - Terminator 2: Judgement Day
6. Will Smith uploads a virus to save the world - Independence Day
5. Dr. Brundle tries out his fly machine - The Fly
4. Velociraptors come off as geniuses - Jurassic Park
3. Agents throw punches at Neo - The Matrix
2. Superman turns back time - Superman
1. Jodie Foster and company pass the alien MENSA test - Contact
Regular readers will realize this is not something I can let stand...
10. The author says: "So, the same company that brings you the dark side of the force and the death star decides that tall, slow, off balance elephant thingies with laser beam-shooting tusks are the best way to ferret out the rebels from their underground fortress?"
Leaving aside the question of whether the Star Wars movies count as sci-fi ("It's the ship that made the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs."), the coolness of the AT-ATs advancing on Hoth outweighs the question of their strategic value. Of course, the generator providing the shield against bombardment could only be taken out from the ground anyway. Oh, and can anyone say, "midichlorians?" Or,"teddy bear creatures with sticks and rocks defeating the most impressive military in the universe?" Or, "Why the hell are we wearing this lousy armor when all it seems to do is prevent us from shooting straight?"
I knew you could.
9. The author says: So many sci-fi fans have heard this one that it's almost bad form to mention it, but the blunder is pretty simple: Aliens navigate the vastness of space and find life on a puny planet. Then it turns out they need cornfields on that puny planet to point them to fresh meat.
You can argue that Shyamalan isn't so much making a science fiction movie as he is an allegory about love and family. All the same, this isn't the one I've heard fans talk about. The fact that aquaphobic aliens landed on a planet 3/4-covered by water is.
8. The author says: "Oh, thank goodness the acid-blooded crab thing fell off my face. Hey, do I smell scrambled eggs?" Despite a ship full of highly-intelligent technical and science people, the crew of the Nostromo decides not to quarantine their alien-toting buddy long enough to make sure there were no problems along the lines of, say, stomach erupting alien babies.
Which "highly-intelligent technical and science people" are you talking about? The android who wanted the alien on board in the first place? The officers (who were technical in the respect they could run the Nostromo, I guess)? Or the ship's crew, who who more concerned with their cut than some xenomorph? It's all irrelevant, though, because Alien is still one of the scariest movies ever made.
7. The author says: There were at least 50 smarter, easier alternatives to whacking Sarah Conner and her unborn son other than sending back the hit-machine to the land of big hair. And after screwing up the first time, why would they try again after Sarah has had years to train both herself and her military mastermind child?
Meh. I tend not to think too hard about time-travel movies (to my mind, the best treatments of the subject are the Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episode "Time and Punishment" and Army of Darkness). My understanding on this one is, the further back one goes in time, the greater the chance of doing something that could actually erase your existence. I liken it to the goalie coming out of the crease to take away the angle of a guy on a fast break: the matchup seems easier, but one miscalculation and the biscuit's in the basket, to use a technical and scientific term.
Anyway, if I had to go off on Terminator movies, I'd ask how a shotgun can consistently knock a cyborg that weighs almost half a ton off its feet.
6. The author says: "Independence Day" had already lost all credibility when Will Smith climbed into an alien spacecraft and after a few moments, figured out how to fly the thing. But dumb turns to laugh-out-loud ludicrous when Will conquers the aliens with a floppy disk, in an absurd homage to "War of the Worlds."
Too easy. Independence Day was crap, but it looks like 2001: A Space Odyssey compared to Armageddon.
5. The author says: Jeff Goldblum's character is smart enough to defy physics and biology in every conceivable way, including appearing attractive to Geena Davis, but he isn't smart enough to keep his equipment free of household pests.
He could've sprayed a little Hot Shot in there, but who wouldn't have gotten into that thing? Science fiction and horror movies are filled with scientists who probably tampered with Things Better Left Alone. But, in news that might come as a shock to the author...real scientists do this, too.
4. The author says: Jaws was a thoughtless eating machine and scared the swim trunks off of us, so why did we need dinosaurs fresh from the debate club?
Dude, a mechanical shark was certainly scary in 1975, but are you actually skipping over the whole "frog DNA splice" angle to complain about how smart the velociraptors were? Why not complain about how they were too big, while you're at it? Hell, how can you ignore the eye-gouging abomination that was The Lost World?
3. The author says: Anything that happens to you in the Matrix happens to you for real, right? Thus verifying the theory that if you die in your dream, you're really dead. So why then do the Agents decide that shotguns and kung-fu are the best way to take out Neo?
Once again, you picked the wrong movie in the franchise to criticize. How about in Reloaded, where Neo - obviously capable of flight - bothers to engage in these twenty minute brawls in the first place. Or when the citizens of Zion, facing certain destruction, decide to throw a rave?
2. The author says: This is the classic problem with any time travel plot. If Superman can turn back time, why not turn it back a few years, find Lex Luthor, and break a few fingers? Instead, Superman turns back the clock just enough to save Lois from a not-so-shallow grave.
I have absolutely no problem with this one. It was one of the defining moments of Superman's character in that film.
Again, this gets on the list and Superman 3 and The Quest for Peace don't even get a sniff?
1. The author says: Intelligent creatures from across the universe go to great lengths to let humanity know they exist in an otherwise great movie called "Contact." Life from distant galaxies intelligent enough to capture our rays, translate them, then dramatically send us the blueprints for a wormhole machine, somehow found it necessary to put those blueprints on a flattened piece of origami.
Jesus, this is a top 10? The author must've needed an extra paycheck, because this reads like something I'd write two hours before deadline with no reference materials. I'm not going to construct an alternate list, but I can't believe Contact gets slagged and these movies get a pass (spoilers follow):
> Spider-Man 2 - Can you "put out" a fusion reactor by dunking it in a river?
> The entirety of the movies Lost in Space, Armageddon, The Core, Godzi